• roofuskit@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Curious that they would say that when there was no precedent to their reinterpretation of the second amendment.

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Long historical precedents are only important if they don’t like the law. If they like the law, then they’ll find justification even if they need to misquote some 15th century philosopher.