• Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That phone is pretty much the most innovative smartphone of all time. But on youtube there’s a video stress-testing how it would hold up to real life conditions… and it gets completely destroyed by a handful of sand. Same applies to pretty much all foldables: if you get any sand or dirt in the folds, you can easily destroy the screens.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yea, I just want a good, small form-factor smartphone with excellent battery life, a decent camera, and a nice screen, really. Foldables are both way overkill for that and not as durable.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          phones have become status symbols; what’s why apple is going to start making folding iphones too.

          i bought my gen-alpha grand nieces/nephews some motorolas last xmas and they rejected them because they wanted iphones.

          i was disappointed at first, but then pleased to learn that i lit a fire that forced my their parents to buy expensive AF iphones to quell the rabble and none of the motorolas helped subsidized the $6,000+ cost. lol

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Sad, would’ve loved a moto. My phone is nearing 5 years old, at which point I’ll probably grab a used Pixel and throw GrapheneOS on it, wish Chinese phones weren’t so legislated against in the US.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              wish Chinese phones weren’t so legislated against in the US.

              tell me about it; i’ve got a redmi that’s become an expensive paperweight because of it and despite the fact that it’s comparable to a pixel 8.

              i’m forced to make due with a VASTLY inferior “american” phone (and for the same price). i’m waiting for the day that graphane/postmarket/lineage/etc. starts supporting my redmi model.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’d really like a smaller phone too, and I think that some of the better companies like Oneplus are starting to offer smaller variants (Oneplus 13T and 13S just got released a few months ago, and they’re 6.3" whereas most now are 6.8").

          Besides that tho I’ve found OnePlus and Xiaomi phones to be pretty unbeatable the past few years, for battery life and fast charging.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Would be nice if phones from PRC-based companies weren’t so legislated against in the US Empire. I think OnePlus isn’t as blacklisted from bands as Xiaomi or Huawei, so that might be the direction I head, but for now it seems safest to just go for a used Pixel and throw GrapheneOS on it, unfortunately.

    • considine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They cost waaaaay too much. Most flagship phones do.

      Still using my two year old Xiaomi Redmi Note 12. It was super cheap, relatively. Like about 12 times cheaper than the Huawei tri-fold.

      • Wakmrow [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They for sure do cost too much but for the first time in about a decade they made a phone I think it’s actually cool consumer tech and something that I want

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      (People’s Republic of) Samsung is supposed to announce one of those soon. Though who knows if it’ll even be available outside of Asia.

  • happyfullfridge@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    i know this will be controversial here but both bad. Technological megacorpos and monopolies have too much power.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Huawei is employee owned. Further, it exists in a socialist economy and is subject to state control, it isn’t Huawei that has power over the economy, but the state that has power over Huawei.

      • Alteon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s “employee owned” but still has a CCP Party Committee that makes decisions. Chinese companies have historically created backdoors in both software and hardware, and have no issues with stealing proprietary data, code, or designs.

        Ignorance of security concerns is pretty much akin to the saying, “Well, I have nothing to hide. Who cares if the government spies on me.” It’s not just the US government saying it, it’s pretty much any security company or individual worth their salt saying it.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I just said Huawei exists in a socialist economy and is subject to state control, I was quite literally referencing the CPC Party Committee that ensures Huawei cooperates with collective planning. Further, the CPC, even if we considered them to be evil (which I don’t, for the record), still would be preferable over US-based companies as I’m a US citizen.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    this one hurts; i had to stop using my favorite redmi phone because american carriers have banned chinese phones.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        i think it’s less about failing capitalism and more about eliminating competition for for high end smart phones since you can get iphone level quality phones at chinese prices.

        my redmi was competitive with the $1k+ google pixel, but costed less than half; now it’s an expensive paperweight.