Disapproving of mud-slinging towards previous socialist heads of state like Stalin, Mao, Deng, etc. has nothing at all to do with denying settler-colonialism in the US. You have literally no evidence of me denying the US Empire’s settler-colonial nature, I regularly push for decolonization and landback, especially over on my Lemmy.ml account where there are far more bloodthirsty settlers.
You laser-focused on a strawman because you aren’t interested in discussion, like you claim, but sowing division until you eventually get banned. Wrecker behavior.
This is largely a shitposting site. If you want discussion, post in the theory or politics comms, or the news comms. Further, you said this was to provoke discussion, but you accused me of being a patsoc unprovoked after I gave a thoughtful response. You’re just a wrecker, and not even an entertaining one at that.
I’m opening the floor to the motion to elect this user and every member associated with his order of the “The Radiant Trail” [preliminary] ACP(M) to be elected to the official hexbear entertainment committee for a period of five years.
You’re also not interested in discussion yet claim to be doing this to spark discussion, you’ve been on Hexbear for years but you also just joined, etc. etc. Is this dialectics? /s
Everything is dialectics, so yes, my responses are dialectical. My words have dual meaning. I am new insofar as this is a new account, but I am senior here because I have been here on many other accounts.
Other users have certainly felt it important to spark a struggle session surrounding Deng Xiaoping Theory, so you wouldn’t be alone, but at the same time, this is wrecker behavior for a Left-Unity shitposting site. Claiming that you’re here to spark discussion, and refusing to engage with discussion, isn’t “dialectics,” it’s pedantry.
To be frank you’re pontificating harder than the Spartacist League trot I met in L.A who sold me a newspaper while bickering and nitpicking over anything I said.
Disapproving of mud-slinging towards previous socialist heads of state like Stalin, Mao, Deng, etc. has nothing at all to do with denying settler-colonialism in the US. You have literally no evidence of me denying the US Empire’s settler-colonial nature, I regularly push for decolonization and landback, especially over on my Lemmy.ml account where there are far more bloodthirsty settlers.
You laser-focused on a strawman because you aren’t interested in discussion, like you claim, but sowing division until you eventually get banned. Wrecker behavior.
If I was not interested in discussion, I would not be on a discussion board to begin with. That makes no sense.
This is largely a shitposting site. If you want discussion, post in the theory or politics comms, or the news comms. Further, you said this was to provoke discussion, but you accused me of being a patsoc unprovoked after I gave a thoughtful response. You’re just a wrecker, and not even an entertaining one at that.
I am not your entertainment committee.
I’m opening the floor to the motion to elect this user and every member associated with his order of the “The Radiant Trail” [preliminary] ACP(M) to be elected to the official hexbear entertainment committee for a period of five years.
Aye
Aye.
Aye
aye
aye
Aye
Aye
aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
是
It’s quite humorous a Gorgonzola-ite is using wobbly emojis to try and insult the Stalinist admins
You’re also not interested in discussion yet claim to be doing this to spark discussion, you’ve been on Hexbear for years but you also just joined, etc. etc. Is this dialectics? /s
Also, this is the meme community.
Everything is dialectics, so yes, my responses are dialectical. My words have dual meaning. I am new insofar as this is a new account, but I am senior here because I have been here on many other accounts.
So yes, I am new here.
tagline pls
Other users have certainly felt it important to spark a struggle session surrounding Deng Xiaoping Theory, so you wouldn’t be alone, but at the same time, this is wrecker behavior for a Left-Unity shitposting site. Claiming that you’re here to spark discussion, and refusing to engage with discussion, isn’t “dialectics,” it’s pedantry.
If you think I am such a troll and wrecker, you had best report me to moderation.
No need.
Yes you are
You disprove your point even as you make it, because you are ignoring most of what they put forward over and over again.
To be frank you’re pontificating harder than the Spartacist League trot I met in L.A who sold me a newspaper while bickering and nitpicking over anything I said.