• BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    English people. The Scottish, Welsh and Irish mostly disapprove of the monarchy. Very few people aside from the English actually like these people. I guess that goes with the territory of being a billionaire family for hundreds of years.

    • aaron@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      In terms of overwhelming media coverage think of them as the Brit version of the Kardashians (maybe from a few years back no idea how often the Kardashians are in the news these days).

      Other than that I think we probably never greatly reduced the role of our monarchy at the end of ww1, the way much of the rest of Europe did, because at that point we were still global reserve currency and similar to Americans in later decades up to more recently - things seemed to be going relatively well and we’d just ‘won’ ww1 so why change it? Our coal production peaked around 1921 (iirc), after that the £ began its decline before the British empire was bankrupted by ww2, Bretton Woods happened and the US took over as global erserve currency. We did alright with a somewhat socialist society until the late 70s, from which point neo-liberalism took over and we have raced rightwards, like the US, and the monarchy needs to go but is the least of our problems.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        We are wistful for the days when our biggest problem was getting rid of kings and queens. Our first order of business is getting rid of bigots and racists. Then we can focus on alleviating the stranglehold of business, which will clear the path for dealing with climate change and investing in our health and education.

    • damdy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, even me as mostly anti monarchy had some respect for the queen. Now it’s just ‘who cares.’

      She did her job very well, and I’m not convinced the enormous benefits outweigh the obligations.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I always found it weird when people would act like they have it so cushy. On a material comfort level, sure, but on basically every other level it sounds awful. You couldn’t pay me to put myself or my children through that.

        Footballers who get paid a packet and can then vanish into obscurity if they so choose? That sounds like the good life.

        Hard pass on the gilded cage thing. I’m no monarchist, so now that the single nationalised granny initiative is over I’m wondering whether we’ll keep them. Inertia will probably keep it going for a while yet. Transitioning away from them seems like it’d probably somehow be even more expensive and troublesome than living with them. A bit like trying to totally rid a large building of mice.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not even in a material comfort level. Buckingham Palace is in a very bad way with threadbare furnishings, the roof caving in, a massive rat problem, and large parts abandoned. The current King refuses to live there.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Brits don’t take stuff to they colony, but away from it. But if ants were sentient they’d call it an empire too, most likely.