• starman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    C#: did you just copy Java’s essay and put your name on it?

    COBOL: why it looks like it’s from 16th century?

    PHP: I did not ask for a spaghetti recipe

    alternative Rust: it’s great, but I asked for an essay, not “🔥 Blazingly fast rust-based EssayOS”

      • 30p87@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        C# is Java except from Microsoft, which means it’s designed and much more integrated with Windows. The official .net core even brings telemetry right out of the box. Using C# apps on Linux is a pain, which is very bad considering it’s supposed to be like Java - compile once, run anywhere - except Java actually achieves it.

        Also, Minecraft runs on Java. Therefore, C# is useless. Boom, destroyed /s

    • raubarno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Rust v3: “It’s three hours and I’m still compiling dependencies”

      EDIT: Also, “What does Option[Arc[Mutex[BTreeMap[String, Box[RefCell[Box[amp mut F>>>>>>> where F : Fn(T) -> U in your essay mean?” (srry, I didn’t come up with a better obscure data type, it’s probably gibberish)

      EDIT2: Lemmy deletes ‘less than’ sign for some damn reason (time to build Lemmy at home?)

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My friend partially explained how the build safety system worked for Rust and my first reaction was “holy shit the link stage must take a century”.

        “Yes.”

      • kattenluik@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think you should criticize a language that you clearly have not even learnt the syntax of. Dependencies are also a one-time compile and linking just your own program or library does not take very long, and if you’ve ever worked with C languages it’s all the same.

        Just because you don’t know how to read a languages syntax doesn’t mean it’s bad, it’s just like how you have to learn anything else. Rust is quite self-explanatory afterwards.

        • raubarno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I do write Rust projects

          EDIT: Well, it depends. If you statically compile everything with C build systems, in that sense, the speed should not differ from generic cargo workload. Although, in most cases, projects written in C are dynamically linked due to several reasons, one of which is code speed. In practice, even huge projects written in C (30k to 10k LOC) build quicker than C++ or Rust.

          I’m not pooping on generics, either. Generics is a saviour for correctness and performance. Yet, I want to point out the type creep is still a thing, even though there’s little we can do about it.

          Anyways, this thread should be better interpreted with humor, instead of technical accuracy.

          • kattenluik@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair, I just don’t like it even when it’s humorous as it still speaks of a language in a bad way.

            Also, if you use a Unix system to build your projects I can recommend you check out Mold if you haven’t yet as it speeds up the linking significantly.