• AernaLingus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    Huawei officials said in 2024 alone it installed 100,000 fast chargers across China for its electric vehicles; by contrast, in 2021 the U.S. Congress allocated $7.5 billion toward a network of charging stations, but as of November this network had only 214 operational chargers across 12 states.

    lol

      • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a wonderful case of the feds can’t build them directly, so they give a bunch of money to the states, but they can’t build them directly either, so they give that money to local governments, who are under no obligation to actually spend it on the chargers, and there’s grift at every level.

        Federalization is a fucking joke.

        • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even ‘Electrify America’ which has built about 4k is a company that essentially exists as a punishment-deal for the automanufacturers. So they’re incentivised to build them, but much less so to actually maintain them or keep them reliably online.

    • Assian_Candor [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re just racists how else can you explain it

      Like if someone demonstrates so visibly what is obviously a superior system of governance you would think we would just copy that thing.

      Our government is just totally hamstrung by ideology. Even the liberals are unable to admit that state investment is a good thing and creates tangible public benefit. Sad really.

      • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s racism for sure, but it’s more than that. American government is damn near a religious institution, with the Founding Fathers as the prophets and the Constitution as the Bible. It’s more than ideological. It’s dogmatic. And just like with religion, they pick and choose which parts they believe to justify their goals at any given moment. This is also why they won’t adopt a system that does the best for the most people possible. Their religion/government demands a hierarchy where a few enjoy paradise, and the rest suffer.

  • lil_tank [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    2 days ago

    I believe the best future for both of us — on the eve of the A.I. revolution — is a strategy called: Made in America by American workers in partnership with Chinese capital and technology.

    That’s it, we reached the point of reverse Deng Xiaoping

  • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    And while many Chinese engineers may not graduate with M.I.T.-level skills, the best are world class, and there are a lot of them. There are 1.4 billion people there. That means that in China, when you are a one-in-a-million talent, there are 1,400 other people just like you.

    Total oversimplification. Yes, population is an important variable but so is education and employment. It does not matter if you have 1400 potential geniuses most of then are not being educated. It does not matter if you have 1400 potential geniuses if there are only a dozen positions in the economy relevant to their work. And more importantly, it really doesn’t matter if you have geniuses at all, because genius intellect is not how things get done.

    In liberalspeak: you have to utilize your human capital to its full extent!

  • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Guy in China’s tech sector notes that “the bosses” want to put AI in everything, even stupid shit like refrigerators

    This gormless fuck: “WOW AI IS SO COOL I LOVE AI AI IS THE BEST CHINA IS DOING BETTER THAN US” so-true

    • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      the full quote is… oof

      A young Chinese auto engineer who once worked for Tesla here told me: “Now everyone is competing over how much A.I. is being inserted. Now you brag about how much A.I. you insert. Everyone is committed. ‘I will use A.I., even if I don’t know how right now.’ You are preparing for that, even if you are on a simple production line for manufacturing refrigerators. ‘I have to use A.I., because my boss told me to.’”

      stupid investor hype is apparently universal

      • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        porky-happy: “Hey hey…why don’t the poors use AI? Don’t be a luddite, kiddo! It’s the fuuuuuture!”

        yes-honey-left: “I use AI every day from my 2017 car’s safety features.”

        It’s probably the case, but isn’t there like with EVs, you go somewhere to charge them and grab a bite and then your car texts you when it’s done charging? I know that’s how Tesla sold the superchargers back when I was a lib and thought Muskrat was the coolest person ever. Just call that “AI”.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lmao, what would they even put AI in FOR? It’s a fridge. As far as I’m concerned, if technology doesn’t look like something straight out of Dragon Ball or Pokemon, I’m not interested.

      Let me guess: they want me to pay a subscription on top of the fridge I bought and then also show me ads.