“Department of State contractors must certify that they do not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable anti-discrimination laws and…
Wow… what cucked language. Can’t even comit to being anti-DEI with that carvout of “no DEI BUT only if the DEI program violates anti-discrimination laws”.
What anti-discrimination laws? Whose anti-discrimination laws?
I’m thinking that adding the “any applicable anti-discrimination” part, it invalidates the claim that DEI is denying white cis men jobs. Now there’s a legal back and forth that can happen where somebody wanting to kill a DEI program will have to argue doing things like “putting job postings where X minority community are likely to see them” somehow denying white people jobs first.
i mean it’s all specious they’re relying on intimidation and/or a ruling from the supreme court confirming unitary executive theory, not legitimate legal arguments
Wow… what cucked language. Can’t even comit to being anti-DEI with that carvout of “no DEI BUT only if the DEI program violates anti-discrimination laws”.
What anti-discrimination laws? Whose anti-discrimination laws?
Also, anti-discrimination laws literally IS DEI!
Yeah, right?
the legal argument against DEI they’re doing is that it discriminates against white men.
I’m thinking that adding the “any applicable anti-discrimination” part, it invalidates the claim that DEI is denying white cis men jobs. Now there’s a legal back and forth that can happen where somebody wanting to kill a DEI program will have to argue doing things like “putting job postings where X minority community are likely to see them” somehow denying white people jobs first.
i mean it’s all specious they’re relying on intimidation and/or a ruling from the supreme court confirming unitary executive theory, not legitimate legal arguments