I’m thinking that adding the “any applicable anti-discrimination” part, it invalidates the claim that DEI is denying white cis men jobs. Now there’s a legal back and forth that can happen where somebody wanting to kill a DEI program will have to argue doing things like “putting job postings where X minority community are likely to see them” somehow denying white people jobs first.
i mean it’s all specious they’re relying on intimidation and/or a ruling from the supreme court confirming unitary executive theory, not legitimate legal arguments
the legal argument against DEI they’re doing is that it discriminates against white men.
I’m thinking that adding the “any applicable anti-discrimination” part, it invalidates the claim that DEI is denying white cis men jobs. Now there’s a legal back and forth that can happen where somebody wanting to kill a DEI program will have to argue doing things like “putting job postings where X minority community are likely to see them” somehow denying white people jobs first.
i mean it’s all specious they’re relying on intimidation and/or a ruling from the supreme court confirming unitary executive theory, not legitimate legal arguments