I’m thinking that adding the “any applicable anti-discrimination” part, it invalidates the claim that DEI is denying white cis men jobs. Now there’s a legal back and forth that can happen where somebody wanting to kill a DEI program will have to argue doing things like “putting job postings where X minority community are likely to see them” somehow denying white people jobs first.
i mean it’s all specious they’re relying on intimidation and/or a ruling from the supreme court confirming unitary executive theory, not legitimate legal arguments
I’m thinking that adding the “any applicable anti-discrimination” part, it invalidates the claim that DEI is denying white cis men jobs. Now there’s a legal back and forth that can happen where somebody wanting to kill a DEI program will have to argue doing things like “putting job postings where X minority community are likely to see them” somehow denying white people jobs first.
i mean it’s all specious they’re relying on intimidation and/or a ruling from the supreme court confirming unitary executive theory, not legitimate legal arguments