• ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I don’t envy the cop who has to try and take a sword from someone who can teleport behind you.

  • egonallanon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I love the government announcing things that were already crimes are still crimes.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      5 days ago

      It was illegal to own one? I understand using it or carrying in public, but literally owning one???

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Carrying it in public can mean literally displaying it in your front yard in many jurisdictions, so I don’t really agree with your assessment.

          • festnt@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 days ago

            for self defense i’d give a very maybe. nobody is gonna try to rob a person who has a sword and the thing is not exactly hideable

            also a sword… for hunting? that’ll make the person wielding the sword in more danger than the animals themselves

  • stray@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    This ban is in response to a large number of teenagers harming and killing each other with mall ninja shit in the UK. It’s been legal for adults to purchase and own them in their own homes, but the sellers have not been diligent, so children are buying them anyway, hence the ban.

    Look up “zombie knife” if you want visual examples, but know that generally the blades are real and not blunt for decoration as a reasonable person might expect.

    The ban doesn’t apply to historical items (which these are not) or legitimate uses (of which these have none).

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Disclaimer: I don’t live in the UK

      legitimate uses (of which these have none).

      The intended “use” is generally decorational, so I guess whether that’s legitimate depends on how tacky you think it is.

      The blades are real and not blunt for decoration as a reasonable person might expect.

      I have a decorational blade and while the edges are certainly not sharp, it would absolutely result in a lot of bleeding to get hit by it. I have seen some blades that have blunter edges than mine has, but even then it would still be dangerous as a blunt weapon, although no more so than a baseball bat, golf club, or some other form of “sports stick”.

      • stray@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The edge you’re taking about is normal for a decorative blade. It’s not good enough to be a real weapon or tool, but too dangerous to be played around with. The “zombie knives” being used by kids in the UK are real blades. The sites I’ve seen use it as a selling point that they aren’t just for show. They’re sharp enough for a kid to stab another through the chest.

        e: Generally also the build quality of decorative blades is very poor, because they’re for decoration. The blade snapping or coming out of the handle altogether and then flying unexpectedly is often how one becomes injured with them accidentally, trying to make a cool video cutting up cardboard or whatever. They’re not practical for any purpose other than as decor.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Kids in all countries play with sharp things, and they far and away know well enough to not stab eachother. Kids who are doing that are psychopaths, it’s not an issue with having access to a sharp stick.

  • yumpsuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Great, what the fuck do they expect me to do when my kids are playing outside and get rushed by 30-50 feral Ikko-Ikki?

  • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    Wouldn’t this be racist or similar? Owning a Japanese sword is illegal, but what about a European sword or an English sword?

    • festnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      actually you’re being racist because not all japanese swords are ninja swords /s

      yeah unless they prohibit every kind of sword equally (and give enough time for everyone to somehow get rid of theirs) it’s kinda being racist

  • Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Would a naginata be okay? It’s a polearm, not a sword.

    What about a tanto, which is really more of a dagger?