Pupils will be banned from wearing abayas, loose-fitting full-length robes worn by some Muslim women, in France’s state-run schools, the education minister has said.

The rule will be applied as soon as the new school year starts on 4 September.

France has a strict ban on religious signs in state schools and government buildings, arguing that they violate secular laws.

Wearing a headscarf has been banned since 2004 in state-run schools.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    France has a strict ban on religious signs in state schools and government buildings, arguing that they violate secular laws.

    Is this a case of being lost in translation or something? I wouldn’t consider religious garb to be a “sign.”

          • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The real question is: would they stop a kid from wearing a necklace with a cross, for example?

            • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the UK at my kids school, yes. No jewelry of any kind allowed. Not even studs in newly pierced ears, which is a bit annoying.

              • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I also went to a UK school and there was no jewellery of any kind because it was against uniform policy, not for religious reasons. I was pretty sure there was no problem with religious headgear though, for example Sikh turban wearing.

                I was asking about the French public schools as thats what the article was about.

            • Vespair@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, obviously in the context of this story. It seems weird to assume otherwise to me

              • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s not really obvious, which is why I had to ask. The article focuses on a piece of clothing which isn’t really religiously significant being banned, so I wouldn’t say it’s obvious what falls under the law.

                • Vespair@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But the reason it was banned was clearly identified as being because it is symbolic of a religion. Based on that, how wouldn’t a cross necklace also qualify?

                  • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The law has already been in place for many years and this item is just now being banned, as if they suddenly realised now that it’s symbolic. Don’t act like it should be obvious what items are included and what is not, as that is the whole point of this being news.

                    I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask for a French perspective on the specifics.