• criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The point of the dial is there is no middle ground. You either take it quietly or you’re a troublemaker.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 minutes ago

        I don’t mean to diminish the larger point you’re making about feminism not having middle ground, but from an interface design perspective, a dial very much implies a continuum of settings. When there isn’t middle ground, the interface should be a toggle switch instead.

        Of course this is art, not a real device, so obviously a dial is appropriate because it’s a response to being told to “dial down,” not “switch off.”

        (I almost feel like there could’ve been something different about the way the dial was depicted – maybe with a range with “raging feminist” next to “complicit” and something more extreme above it, or maybe indeed using a toggle instead of a dial – in order to emphasize that “raging feminist” already is as “dialed down” as you could reasonably ask for, but such UI realism would probably just clutter up the design without improving the message. As art, I think the artist got it right as-is.)

        • hope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Is that reaction actually increasing the misogyny though? I kinda expect it’s just bringing out into the open what is already there tbh

            • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              “This rape would be going a lot better for you if you’d just stop struggling so much!”

              • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                54 minutes ago

                Immediately jumping to a rape analogy isn’t fair or apt, you can always make someone else’s argument appear dumb when you jump to an EXTREME

              • Supervivens@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                “All men are fucking douchebags and should die” -> “if they already think I’m a douchebag and the other side will be nice to me…”

                Don’t get me wrong, I understand that that’s an extreme but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen either. I’m not saying I agree really with either side and “turning down the feminism” is a kinda weird thing to say to your student but I have heard multiple different times of someone who saw how much they seemed to be hated and drifted to the right as they were accepted there (even if for the wrong reasons).

    • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I fully agree. This applies not only to feminism but in general - if you want to convince people about something, you need to plan your approach, what to say, know what works on people etc. You cannot just rage like crazy because there’s a high chance you just create a counter reaction.

      F.e. I’d say we can all agree that gay rights are the right thing. But if you come to some conservative village, start shouting at everyone, being super aggresive and rage like a maniac, I’d bet that the only thing you achieve is that you’ll be labeled as “that crazy person”

      I’m really surprised of the responses to this comment, I find this to be a common sense

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.”

        Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

        -Martin Luther King Jr

        Got a lot of the same vibes, really

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m really surprised of the responses to this comment, I find this to be a common sense

        The closer a person and the people they care about get to the chopping block the less common sense it seems.