yunqihao [comrade/them]

1941: RussiansSoviets are orcs, they will do human wave attacks and lose

1945: Noooo

Something something first as tragedy second as farce.

There was no spin they just stated it as a genocide being denied and moved on. A very strange pathetic person it seems.

The level of pathetic most liberals and “anarchists” strive to be is quite impressive.

But genocide apologetics nonetheless.

You haven’t managed to name a single genocide they did anything even approaching apologetics towards not to mind denial. Genuinely what the fuck are you talking about in this thread?

Salvador Allende’s genocide

That’s fair. As I said elsewhere I suppose I was thinking of cringe more like a tool similar to the state. One that at current through much of the world is wielded by reactionary forces to further their aims however that once seized would remain a useful tool simply working for different ends. That in a socialist society it isn’t and shouldn’t be acceptable to act as liberals do now and the enforcement of social standards generally manifests through cringe and marginalisation.

That’s completely fair. I suppose my thoughts when approaching it was to look at it the same way I do the state for example, in that at current through most of the world it’s an oppressive and reactionary force. However it remains a useful tool when seized from the hands of the current liberal hegemonic order that rules over not only the bodies but the minds of much of the people of the world.

If we don’t think marginalised groups should be marginalised then we shouldn’t use a tool of marginalisation.

Is it a crazy take to say their are groups and actions that deserve to be marginalised as cringe. I’m thinking of groups like the liberal who arrogantly spouts off on a topic they only know of through vibes, reactionaries of all stripes, and being an “apolitical” centrist etc. People who fall into categories such as these deserves to be marginalised as cringe imo for the good of society (and to a point honestly themselves).

maos Ls

You mean Deng invading Vietnam, no?

We invaded their minds and have been living their rent free ever since

Considering that a working Chinese EUV machine was up and running last year it appears we’re about half way around that corner already all that’s left is to print some chips which shouldn’t be too much longer, estimates put it between 2028 and 2030 (if not sooner).

Given the chaos of the cultural revolution and the poverty worship of the gang of four and their supporters definitely possible but honestly unlikely.

The most likely reason in my opinion is simply due to how LLMs are trained knowing the general vibe of the training data especially in English (full of atrocity propaganda) when it comes to sensitive people or events it’s best to simply censor it so those most likely to fall for said propaganda can’t be made use of and those who wouldn’t can simply do the research. (There’s a similar train of thought with regards to the firewall and the necessity of a VPN to access western “news” discouraging most who could be made use of to even bother while those who make the effort are less likely to fall for it.)

Reasonably concerned given the consequences should it not be addressed but far less than cracker media would have you believe.

I dont think its crazy that China could beat the US back in a defensive war off their coast given the fact the PLA has the most advanced and largest rocket/missile force on Earth alongside their currently unmatched capacity in drone and ship manufacturing just to start.

China’s military issue is their lack of ability to meaningfully project power which seems is only temporary as the government has nuclear carrier projects and other necessary force projection measures in the works.

You’re right, I dug back into it and the specific “WWII-level destroyer production” line was me mangling a few different sources that were making related but not identical claims.

What is well documented is that China’s shipbuilding capacity and tonnage output absolutely dwarf the United States today. A 2025 CSIS study cited by Navy Times found that a single Chinese shipyard produced more commercial ship tonnage in 2024 than the entire U.S. shipbuilding industry has built since World War II, which is where I likely had the WWII comparison stuck in my head. https://www.navytimes.com/global/asia-pacific/2025/03/11/chinas-shipbuilding-dominance-a-national-security-risk-for-us-report/

That same report notes that China now produces over 50% of global shipbuilding tonnage, while the U.S. accounts for roughly 0.1%.

Separately, U.S. Congressional Research Service and Navy assessments estimate that China’s overall shipbuilding capacity measured in gross tonnage is over 200 times larger than that of the United States, largely due to its integrated civilian–military shipyard system. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL33153

In terms of actual naval output, a senior U.S. Indo-Pacific Command admiral has stated that China is currently producing roughly 3–4 times more naval tonnage per year than the United States, even before accounting for its massive commercial shipbuilding sector. https://www.businessinsider.com/china-outpacing-us-shipbuilding-top-indopacom-admiral-says-2025-4

So the WWII comparison was overstated, but the underlying “issue” is arguably more serious for the US. China controls roughly half of global shipbuilding capacity, much of it in dual-use yards that can be partially redirected under wartime mobilization. The United States, by contrast, represents only a fraction of a percent of global shipbuilding and lacks the industrial depth to rapidly replace naval losses in a prolonged conflict. Apologies again I will have to avoid posting so early in the morning without rechecking my sources.

Ass a kkkanadian kkkitizen I will now usse my sspecial liberal demokkkrakkky besstowed powerss to perssuade the government to releasse all future sstatementss in maoisst sstandard englissh

Its not a weapon if they don’t consider the victims human. Its just the natural order as opposed to it being a weapon against the poor white people.