Also watch palm spring

They also scare the crap out of my dog, and cause a lot of accidents. Though, they can be beautiful…

Lemmy’s user base is pretty interesting, you will find interesting discussions in pretty much most communities. However, if don’t find something interesting, don’t be afraid to start a discussion on your own. Coming from Reddit I used to be afraid of the harassment, but Lemmy is a safer space ❤️

Some general pointers:

1. Beehaw is a good place to look for interesting discussions
2. If you find an interesting comment, take a look at the author’s profile, chance is they have more interesting stuff for you to find
3. Filter by subscribed and hot/active
4. Look for opinion articles

Is this what autism feels like?

Sometimes yes, a lot of us feel isolated, struggle with socialization and connecting with others. Othen it helps to find other ND people, they are just as interested in whatever niche topic you are thinking about.

PS Yesterday, I started a post on AskLemmy after pondering about how technology and science is changing at a faster pace than people (mostly professionals) can adapt.

Yes, I always review the code, just avoid nitpicking the hell out of it.

Not really, we are a small team and we generally trust each other. Sure there are things that could have been better, but it’s not bad either.

I am definitely guilt for that, but I find this approach really productive. We use small bug fixes as an opportunity to improve the code quality. Bigger PRs often introduce new features and take a lot of time, you know the other person is tired and needs to move on, so we focus on the bigger picture, requesting changes only if there is a bug or an important structural issue.

That sounds a bit misleading, the server implementation is FOSS too, at any time someone could setup their own instance.

There is Alovoa, it’s open source, still has a small user base, but you don’t have anything to lose…

So that’s the legal equivalent of the guy committing 10k changes the day before leaving the company…

Reminds me when dayjs decided to change the duration of a month during a random bugfix. I had to update so many tests…

Now I am going to share a horror story: Multitimezone Operational Calendars

Social interactions are totally draining for me, but I cannot understand a person until I had a face to face communication with them.

It’s easy. First, we ask people to submit a copy of their ID, email, SSN, etc… Then, store them unencrypted to a purely secured database, the is accessible from a php service written 10 years ago.

No, they are using an ORM.

yay yay Musk is bad… BUT, and hear me for a second, I kinda agree that OpenAI has betrayed its goal to benefit humanity. Ulterior motive or not, I hope this gets somewhere.

deleted by creator

wow buddy that shrooms are really hitting you

First of all, thanks for the interesting outlook, it gave something to think about!

In general, I don’t like thinking in absolutes. It’s not like everyone will read the article or everyone won’t, some people will and some won’t.

There it helps me to break down to more categories:

1. People that will read the article, understand it, and have critical thoughts to share.
2. People that will read the article, understand it, but won’t have anything to add or critize.
3. People that will read the article, but won’t understand it.
4. People that won’t read the article, but would if something caught their attention (like a question on the comments).
5. People that won’t read the article, but would read the comments.
6. People that won’t read the article, but will comment something interesting about the title or the discussions in the comments.
7. People that won’t interact with the post at all.
8. Other possible categories I haven’t considered.

The telephone game is really helpful to understand how interactions between people of the categories above will go. However, keep in mind that the goal is not necessarily 100% accurate transmission of the author’s message. On the contrary, it’s possible people are looking for different interpretations, relevant information, criticism, and/or a laugh.

Personally, I really like it when people provide quotes they find interesting along with their own analysis. An example would be:

To allow? What? Was Australia requiring/forcing everyone to answer calls from bosses at all hours?

Australia will introduce laws giving workers the right to ignore unreasonable calls and messages from their bosses outside of work hours without penalty, with potential fines for employers that breach the rule.

So you cannot be fired anymore for not answering your boss’s 2AM call. It nice to make to make progress, but the bar is so low it’s a tavern in Hades…

I mean you spend the time to read the article already, why not help someone else save that time?

Also, calling someone lazy is ableist, please don’t do that, you don’t know another person’s circumstances or if that’s a trigger…

Edit: For anyone interested to know more about ableism or why laziness is an ableist concept:

1. You can’t be lazy: laziness doesn’t exist
2. Laziness doesn’t exist but unseen barriers do
3. https://stimpunks.org/glossary/laziness/

Got anything to share? source/screenshots/roadmap/feature-set/mock-ups

The title is pretty self explanatory. Yes, I want to know if it’s AI generated because I don’t trust it.

I agree with the conclusion that it’s important to disclose how the AI was used. AI can be great to reduce the time needed for boilerplate work, so the authors can focus on what’s important like reviewing and verifying the accuracy of the information.