Thank you, but it doesn’t work for me:

!https://lemmy.world/post/26673110

Which war does the EU face? The military of the EU is already bigger than the Russian military. European air superiority will destroy any Russian attack.

Is there not?

Does GB need a cookie? Why do they toot their own horn?

Edit: Does it not feel out of character to you? There is no ceasefire agreement, just an agreement to participate in negotiations. I would assume that to a British prime minister, that’s not worth mentioning and when the BBC writes it like this, that it is a subtle putdown.

See also: instances with individual all feeds https://reddthat.com/post/36815847

There should be another feed, besides subscribed, local and all, that shows the channels that are relevant to the instance.

This idea relates to custom collections: https://lemmy.world/post/26654286

“America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests.”

This is not new. Even England had a shakedown before WW2 support.

How can I link a post without redirecting?

There is an entire instance for the Midwest. Have a look to check if they already have an active community

https://midwest.social/

How does this pen out? If those weapons are meant to be used defencively, they have to be second-strike weapons.

This means that Germany needs nuclear submarines because everything else could be hit by Russian nuclear bombs in the assumed Russian attack.

Preparing nuclear weapons on fighter jets only helps to make Germany a target.

France and UK rightfully ask for support for their nuclear weapons program but there is no need to be further involved than financing it.

Good name, when it comes to cooling

the mistral is a strong, cold, northwesterly wind

According to Yanis Varoufakis, to end the tade imbalances so that the US don’t lose their production capabilities

This would be good for instances if a default custom collection could be added to the “subscribed, local, all” selection.

Then an instance could show the content it wants to represent.

They could, but what do they think will happen then?

Then you have more demand than supply because there is not enough coffee for everybody. This leads to people queueing and some people leaving without coffee.

What’s your opinion of Yanis Varoufakis’ explanation for the tariffs?

What do you mean? There are globally less coffee beans available. Or do you mean the 30%? That’s just an arbitrary number, as I tried to make clear by writing “Let’s say …”.

Kind of, if Yanis Varoufakis has it right

You believe that the accusation then and now were true and that everybody knew but nobody in the position of power prevented the takeover?

Why is the focus on Trump then and not everybody else?

To me it’s easier to believe that this is drama to distract from changes that are in a way necessary but unpopular.

How about this explanation:

There is a reduced supply of coffee beans. Let’s say 30%. This requires that 30% of customers have to be priced out of the market.

If the coffee shop owners only increase the price by several cents then the demand stays the same. They have to fight for coffee beans which drives up their costs step by step.

However, if they increase the price in advance, and far more than necessary right from the start, then the reduced demand matches the available supply and the value of the coffee beans roughly remains the same which allows them to profit from most of the price hike.