The only option is to continue to vote for the least-bad candidates, and work to change the voting system such that a two party system is no longer inevitable.
The only option is to continue to vote for the least-bad candidates, and work to change the voting system such that a two party system is no longer inevitable.
Just yesterday, I wrote a first version of a fairly complex method, then pasted it into GPT-4. It explained my code to me clearly, I was able to have a conversation with it about the code, and when I asked it to write a better version, that version ended up having a couple significant logical simplifications. (And a silly defect that I corrected it on.)
The damn thing hallucinates sometimes (especially with more obscure/deep topics) and occasionally makes stupid mistakes, so it keeps you on your toes a bit, but it is nevertheless a very valuable tool.
It’s a cat and mouse game, except the mouse has effectively infinite lives.
Nah, there’s so little shadowing because it’s a foggy overcast day. It’s basically a giant lightbox.
Get the fuck out of here with your logic! We’re not here to be right, we’re here to win!
FUCK raisins. The nasty little fucks can go decay in a corner alone for all I care.
That one might have in the shower
YouTube is a business with a clearly-defined business model, precisely-tracked direct metrics, and automation up the wazoo. Not a government taking taxes and dealing with human elements for which there are very few direct metrics. They can pay creators based on watch hours or some other usage metric.
I mean, the other other option is violence/terrorism.
When peaceful revolution is made impossible, violent revolution is inevitable.
But the outcome is wildly unpredictable. You can easily end up with a worse result than what you had before.