It’d have to be pretty long to get all the way to a conclusion that meaningless.
It’d have to be pretty long to get all the way to a conclusion that meaningless.
I would not blame this on the new CEO unless there’s some evidence to support it. Wanting to incorporate more ads into the browser is one of the things the previous CEO was known for, and maybe that brilliant idea being met with hostility was one of the things that persuaded her to depart from the role. Whatever this new feature was to be, it most likely had its origins during her tenure.
It seems highly likely that you have mischaracterized the meaning of browser.shopping.experience2023.ads.userEnabled but it doesn’t matter. The mere existence of browser.shopping.experience2023.ads.userEnabled is damning enough on its own.
That’s not the difference between this and the usual kind of enshittification. The users are one side, the advertisers (and google) are the other. Nothing unusual there. The difference is that this time it’s driven by desperate grasping at straws, rather than barefaced greed.
The colour is a little unusual as well.
tell us you don’t understand mathematics without telling us you don’t understand mathematics
Don’t agree with verdicts of the International Criminal Court? Start your own International Kangaroo Court instead! Everyone will have to take it seriously if you just remind them often enough that you’ve got nuclear weapons. You’ll be the envy of all the war criminals.
It’s kind of like arguing that there are more pirates today than there were 400 years ago. Yes, technically correct
citation needed
Did they change the headline, or did you come up with the more click-baity one just for us?