• 18 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月13日

help-circle

  • I definitely had a phase like that. I also was quite disgusted with myself and tried to rein it in as much as possible. I wouldn’t intentionally walk somewhere to see more girls. I also started to fight the urge to glance, because it just felt wrong to me. That went on for a while until I got tired of fighting my own body. I briefly stopped, but quickly noticed that the more I indulged, the stronger these urges got. So, I started to rein them in again to a level that felt good for me.

    I think it’s okay to glance at a pretty women, but that’s it. No staring, no trying to get more glances. It takes some willpower, but the more I practiced and the older I got, the easier it became. Also it does feel a little rewarding to notice the urge to peak at the girl in the short skirt, but to keep your eyes straight until she is gone. Makes me feel like a little superior to the other men I see leering.

    One simple trick is to look around and check out who is glancing/staring instead. A lot of people do that, men and women, though mostly men (at least at women). It’s probably normal, but can be interactive for some. I think it’s important to accept that part of yourself, but also to not indulge it too much. If this seems impossible, I think consulting a therapist might be the way to go.









  • You might be expecting too much nuance from online communities. It’s easy and fun to oversimplify and dunk on a perceived common enemy. Lemmy has a very AI critical community. I imagine on reddit you might get less backlash, at least depending on the community. You might also find more AI friendly places here. In any case, trying to fight against a community bias is often a fools errand. I’m sure your code isn’t slop, but I don’t think you’ll be able to change the minds of random, biased people on the internet with no incentive to really listen to you anyways.

    I’m sure you already know all the reasons why people are against AI and are sick of having to defend yourself. Still, I want to add that even if you use AI as a tool instead of vibe-coding, as a consumer I wouldn’t trust any privacy/security critical software that’s developed with the use of AI. As a layman I can’t check how secure your software is, so I have to rely on simple signifiers to make my judgements. At this point in time, AI is a red flag for me for security reasons alone. I know it’s not “fair” or “accurate”, but I don’t have the time and knowledge to individually check every software to that extend. I know allegedly every programmer now uses AI in some form to code (I personally don’t and most people I know don’t either, but I’m sure it’s just my bubble), but it’s not a sign of quality code in my mind.

    Another thing I want to add is that your hammer comparison should probably include how the hammer was produced and how much resources your hammer consumes to function. There is a strong ethical argument against the use of AI for most use cases. I’d include coding and code reviews. Again, that doesn’t make your code slop, but it might help you understand why so many people are ready to dismiss it as that.






  • So, you’re 18 and he is 33?

    It’s said if you divide your age by 2 and add 7 you roughly get the youngest age you can date. That would be 23,5. Personally, I’ve come to the believe any gap of 10 years or more is too much. Your just in too different parts of your life. There is often a bad power balance and simply different needs.

    Go on the date, have fun, but I wouldn’t get serious.






  • I forgot the exact quote, but the gist was that wealthy people don’t need to actively collude, because their interests naturally align: Lower taxes, less oversight, less restrictions what to do with their wealth, undermine any effort that might threaten existing power structures.

    That also explains why they naturally seem to support authoritarianism and facism, because those systems offer exactly that.