![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/de9f6c6e-16dd-4656-8642-d3d13cba6616.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d7ec2e93-9490-46f9-a9bd-a3e52c25434c.png)
Internet people: NINTENDO IS DESTROYING ALL EMULATORS raaaaaaaa
Reality: Nintendo sued exactly one emulator that was literally charging people to play pirated games
Internet people: NINTENDO IS DESTROYING ALL EMULATORS raaaaaaaa
Reality: Nintendo sued exactly one emulator that was literally charging people to play pirated games
I can finally follow ZUCC on Mastodon, at last
…does anyone actually have a stereoscopic monitor?
Attitudes like this are much worse for the health of the Fediverse, IMO.
A popular instance with users and content? Kill it immediately, we can’t risk people actually using the Fediverse.
I remember people constantly asking for that to be a feature on Reddit, but I don’t believe it was ever implemented.
That’s the tragedy of the commons, and you’ll find it’s true for basically every possible societal organization.
Not OP, but personally I found their level of micromanagement a bit offputting, such as their deletion of every support-adjacent post.
It’s using the MLMYM frontend, which you can actually use via the official MLMYM website with any instance. For example, here is it pointing to lemmy.ml:
It’s another frontend – specifically, it’s this: https://github.com/rystaf/mlmym
You actually did it! Amazing! Thank you so much!
I’ve said this elsewhere, but I don’t really agree with the article’s premise about what happened to XMPP.
XMPP was a niche thing before Google appeared, and it remained a niche thing after Google left. That said, it would have been much better had Google continued to support it!
Not yet, but they’ve said it will be. Personally I’m excited to see “mainstream” social media using ActivityPub, but you’ll find that it’s quite a divisive issue.
This is a great idea, Voyager’s mobile experience is super polished.
Long shot, but would it be possible to get Mlmym installed at old.lemmy.world? Would be a fun throwback!
On android?
While all that is true, you actually shouldn’t do that in your review, as that will often get it flagged/removed. (They’ll think it’s not a “real” review and instead part of a review bombing effort.)
It seemed to work fine at first, but starting today I’m noticing a huge number of async failures; I’ve had to refresh the page in order to get almost anything (comments, posts, communities, list of communities, profiles, etc) to load.
A more likely outcome is Big Tech coming in and fragmenting and dissolving ActivityPub servers like all the Lemmy servers.
How? If, say, Facebook built a Lemmy-compatible instance, the worst they could do is eventually defederate it from other Lemmy instances, in which case we’re right back where we started.
Yup, and this is a good thing IMO. Ad supported instances, subscription based instances, and donation based ones all can coexist, and users can pick whichever they prefer.
Much better than the alternative of “you get stuck with whatever the current CEO thinks is the best strategy”.
Exactly, which is why I said “charging people to play pirated games” (though I suppose it was really just one game, so no plural was needed.)