- 28 Posts
- 47 Comments
2·6 months agoRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
22·6 months agoI’m assuming that’s a “no” because you can’t defend your claim with reliable sources.
Thank you for playing.
[citation needed]
Wanna try the “padding” thing again?
In reference to your unsourced personal opinion, yes, trite is accurate when compared with actual data. And as long as we’re dealing with unsourced personal opinions with no real data to back up the “meaninglessness” of wage increases (never mind the rest of the article), I don’t see much value coming from this conversation.
The article in fact does elaborate on the wage increases, as I’ve quoted. The choice you make to decide that “meaningfulness” only involves narrow comparisons to housing prices is personal, as well to call the wage increases the article talks about as meaningless. That is a trite and uninformed view that wholly ignores those who benefit from increased wages (maybe to pay for increases in housing and other things?). Should wages be stagnant (as the other user tried to say) then I feel that would also be meaningful.
These are not statistics in a vacuum. That is grossly misinterpreting the article, that is very clear on it’s assertions. I would hope that you could find a reliable source that argues that wage increases are meaningless to drive that point home as hard as you two are attempting to do.
This is an (unsourced) opinion to say this is meaningless, and the article describes the meaningfulness of worker wage increases.
https://blueviewfootwear.com/
Same people, they’ve been making biodegradable footwear for a bit now.