• 1 Post
  • 13 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2024

help-circle
  • TheMagicertoCommanderIntroducing Commander Brackets Beta
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I don’t have too much of an idea about actual power of decks since we only play with people in our group of five (we played once against a random at LGS and we had a very bad experience since dude skimmed over the fact that Rofellos is banned and brought a T5 Ulamog against our precons), but reading the descriptions instead of the infographic moved all my decks to T2 and the one with one game changer card should be a T2 as well but it can’t fit since it’s got that lol only two or three other decks in our playgroup are actual T3 by infographic + description


  • TheMagicertoCommanderIntroducing Commander Brackets Beta
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    What do you more experienced players think of this? I’m kinda bad but this tiering doesn’t really fit my decks, as it puts 9/10 into T1 and the tenth one above T2 but below T3 because it’s got one “game changer” even though it’s definitely not my best-performing deck




  • TheMagicertoMTGWon’t see this on any ban list
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    While the statement in the OP is true, have you considered Pauper? If I understand correctly, while I haven’t built a Pauper deck yet, the limitations on card rarity should make it very possible to build a strong deck without spending too much. There’s also proxies, which cost a fraction of real cards and shpuld be good enough to play with



  • That’s great haha very carefully managing how you look to others while actually assembling the pieces for your win is whay I was initially thinking about! But now I understand that in a casual setting I’d be better just playing, altough a bit smarter without going all-in at every turn, otherwise I’d be sitting there doing the bare minimum and watching others play. In a tournament is a great strategy, you’re literally playing to win, in a casual group like mine winning is a good result but not the only objective




  • You’re right, very deck-dependent! One of us runs a heavily upgraded Pantlaza precon that’s basically all creatures, and once they managed to win even after three board wipes even though they kept casting ALL creatures they could lol

    So, yeah, I can see how overextending after you get to 7 devotion can leave you empty-handed when the wipe comes. Definitely something I’ll keep in mind in future!



  • Yes, I guess that’s what I meant! In my playgroup we’re all new to MTG and I’ve noticed that everyone almost always taps out all mana (unless they have a removal/counterspell in hand), me included.

    I should probably start avoiding going all-in like you do, to reduce both how I’m perceived by others and the resources I commit up until the boardwipe. I guess it can be a proper strategy, thanks!