Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Other than more brands and types of e-bikes? Most have existed for quite a while, just not at a consumer level.

And e-bikes are just circuits, or otherwise proprietary components. You’re gonna be following manufacturer guides, or likely videos, so use site results to specify.

There is plenty of different Booleans for those situations, but there’s not many new inventions in the last 5 years.

Who claimed they were? They are tools to help, they have never included all Booleans and they’ve changed over time, my link from a Google engineer even specifies that. They have never meant to be restrictive like AND, OR and NOT, where do you get this idea from?Your website is cancer FYI.

Use :before, and you’ll get no results past that time.

What?

I use them almost daily.

Booleans. Change the year to 2020, or remove certain sites/results.

All the data is still there, just gotta know how to find it, kinda like an old school library at this point! If you’re going through the process of self learning and/or bettering yourself instead of just watching and repeating, you’ll know how to wade through crap already. And if you want the latter, well googles crapification isn’t a concern to you.

Sure, but people STILL knock on the doors. They likely didn’t participate in a conspiracy to get it, sorry.

Turn off the motion sensor and only use the push activation, that wouldn’t break the “auto” recording portion. There’s always exemptions, security and law professionals wouldn’t be left without a way to assist themselves.

Umm… that could have just been the other driver asking the person for their footage from the camera they saw.

Not everything is a conspiracy dude, that’s commonly done after any incident lmfao.

I have cameras and plenty of people have asked me for random footage for thefts and collisions, none being a company or insurance, always the person affected…

Edit, sorry I guess once the police did, but still there’s nothing odd or weird about what happened to you.

No, I’m asking you. Because you seem to be applying the law to stuff it doesn’t apply to, so I’m trying to figure out your knowledge on it, so we can figure out where you went wrong.

And who said ALL the time, security cameras use motion, or a host of other tech to not record all the time and NOT store it. So which law do you think is being broken?

You are asininely saying that if I took a picture of someone throwing something on my house, that would be inadmissible because the street was in it…? Is that what you think the law is doing here…?

Front yards aren’t…

And you can’t record a public street for security? Even if it’s deleted? That makes absolutely no sense, how would you ever catch a crime?

Would be more of a broth or a tea no? There’s no substance which a soup usually has.

Front yards don’t have the expectation of privacy… that applies to backyards doesn’t it?

Just infuse the oil to make the dough.

That’s a credit union, not a bank. Just like 7-11 atms won’t have them either, it’s only bank atms at the branch’s.

Except most people use multiple cards, multiple banks etc. there will absolutely need to some visual verification to be able to ever establish a starting point. It just doesn’t work.

It’s a neat proof of concept, but in reality, that would never hold up in court.

Give your head a shake, I’ve got a bridge to sell you if you actually believe this is being used or can be used for what you claim.