But he made an angry phone call! What else can you expect from one of the most powerful officers in the world?

Joke’s on you. I’m into this shit.

I’d say: When you can communicate with other speakers of that language. Then, since you can communicate in two languages you’d be bi-lingual.

“That’s so cool man. What was the weirdest one?”

Removed by mod

I’ll assume you’re not just trolling:

It is implicit in the title. *… get less sex.". Less sex compared to what? Bingo.

This title only works if you start with the premise that there is a “base amount of sex” men should be getting, and doing chores “gets you less” than that.

Bro what? Sir this is a Lemmy’s, you’re not talking to your therapist. Touch some grass if an internet comment that you chose to engage with pushed against your boundaries.

Could you say more? What model pixel and what temp? I’ve never noticed mine getting hotter than a mild warmth.

“I have the concept of a nuclear sub, it’s gonna be the best nuclear sub. People at gonna see it and be like: That’s such a nuclear great sub. Such sub.”

He has the concept of being rich.

If he uses 100% of his power it turns all the way back to grapes.

The need to control raises from fear.

No but your tounge is literally a chemical analyzer so…

Give your loved one a lick before and after cremation. Fool proof method.

Lol. Fuck them swiss bees, I guess?

Nah. It’d be alien themed-halloween.

An atheist who finds cero evidence, but does not believe (or assert) there is no divinity, is not an atheist, they are an agnostic-atheist.

I don’t think it matters. But belief in there being no divinity, is by definition: a-theism (no-god)

Side note: Everyone is a believer in things that do not exist. Like perfect geometry, or the value of paper money.

You are correct. Atheism is the belief (ironically) that there is no divinity.

I think what you describe (not really caring and leaning towards there not being divinity) would be called atheist-agnostic.

Someone who does think there is divinity but doesnt really care would be a deist-agnostic.

These are more complex concepts than I’m painting them to be, but if you Google them you can see if they fit the way you see yourself.

Not a fan of Starlink. But net negative to humanity? Idk about that.

Let say we do lose that band of the em spectrum. Does that take away more than we gain by improving the life of the dude above and many like him?

As much as I like science and space, shouldn’t “humanity’s” first concern be the well-being of humans? I’d say we live at a time where Internet access should be a public utility, not having it marks a dramatic difference in opportunity. Starlink isn’t that, but it’s better than nothing.

Having scientists looking at space is important, but it doesn’t help everyday joe, who needs the most help.

That being said. I agree it is up to governments to find their balls and regulate the use of space. Like they did with gasoline.

I mean if Trump’s speech for Jan 6 didn’t count…