I disagree, because there are some fugly people out there. Boobs are certainly no longer good boobs when the nipple is below her belly button.
I disagree, because there are some fugly people out there. Boobs are certainly no longer good boobs when the nipple is below her belly button.
That’s because they’re such an important and pleasure able part of life. Especially sunshine and UV exposure.
There’s things you can do to reduce the risk, but most people would be worse off by trying to completely avoid them altogether.
I disagree with that analogy. There’s a very noticable difference between how the cars goes (and sounds) among those fuel types. They may all get you to your destination, but the experience is moderately different.
And maybe that actually makes it a good analogy. I’m not really sure.
I’m not following why you think that’s in contrast with what I’ve said. I agree that simple life being everywhere is more likely than complex being anywhere.
It seems to me that simple life being anywhere could be unlikely enough.
It’s not fine if it’s what’s used in the title. It’s fine to include it as part of the post, but only including the surface temp in the title is misleading.
I’m not convinced of this. It could also be that it’s also that unfathomably likely to like to develop and evolve.
Yep. Unless you’re trying to cook eggs on the ground, then you can start letting people know when it finally gets hot enough to do that.
Nope, not at all. You completely misunderstood my point.
I’m not saying the ground suddenly got hotter and everything else stayed the same. In this case, it’s just a metric that’s quoted because it has a misleading high value especially by people who are just scrolling through.
It’s click bait.
Being friendly is far more effective than trying to punish people to make them agree with you. Especially when there’s no immediate and obvious consequence of their individual actions.
Talking about surface temperature is pretty misleading.
Nah, if Google maps says it takes 10 hours, then it takes 10 hours with stops unless you’re in the bottom 10% of traffic (such as if you’re a truck towing a trailer).
If you’re like most people going 5 to 10 mph over, then you’ll beat Google maps time by about 15 minutes per 2 hours of drive time without stopping.