

Are you a woman?
wiki-user: unruffled
“In every State, the government is nothing but a permanent conspiracy on the part of the minority against the majority, which it enslaves and fleeces.”
- Mikhail Bakunin
Queer/trans gender abolitionist | anarchist | piracy enthusiast
aspe:keyoxide.org:LSZT4AL3BUPMJZGHIJAVZAJLHY


Are you a woman?


Who would find this meme objectionable?



Wtf racist shitpost is this?


Even if he did, Israel terrorists have killed way more people than Hamas ever has. But it’s fine and dandy to support Israel, according to the same government that’s prosecuting this poor soul.


You’ve given no reasonable arguments in defense of the charge you are being transphobic here. I’ll give you one more chance to explain where you are coming from and to disambiguate your comments.


Being a gender abolitionist is fine (if that’s what you’re trying to express here) but not at the expense of celebrating trans pride. As it stands, your comments look like transphobia to me. If not transphobia then why transphobia shaped?


Just keep pandering to racist misogynists instead. Great advice, standing for nothing except the status quo has done so well for your candidates previously.


Db0 has been onto it already.


He’s already put some mitigations in place.


As far as I can tell, it’s just because db0 posted about it initially.


It gave us some good memes.
smug levels off the charts. gross.
We’re included in what the lead developer describes as “bottom of the barrel” “people rejected by civil society.”
That’s fucked up. And he’s the self-appointed “nice” [secret]police? Yikes.
Yeah, I didn’t know I had it in me! Death to Zionism. Such violence.
Folks from pretty much every political spectrum across Canada and Mexico hate America nowadays. So you obviously don’t get out much.




Yeah, I think repost bots are fine for certain use cases, but they should 100% be identified as bots, and not pretend to be a human account.


Most probably x.com is the closest fit, though why anyone would choose that platform is beyond me. For clarity, are you a free speech libertarian or an anarchist?
Ok fair enough. Just seems like you are arguing about this for the sake of it, instead of because you necessarily disagree with the conclusions.
So that is basically saying, “Yes, the amount of misogynist content online is increasing.” and “But [maybe] no big deal.”
I get your point from a purely logical perspective, but why pick this argument in this community? And why make the assumption it’s no big deal, when it seems at least as likely to be, in fact, a big deal?