

fascist CEO
this again🙄 bloody puritans
🇺🇦Donate to help volunteer fighters defend Ukraine! https://protectavolunteer.com/ 🇺🇦
🌲Help plant tree’s, remove carbon, protect rainforest and more!
ikt has funded planting of 1,142 trees and the prevention of 53.74 tCO2e from being emitted
fascist CEO
this again🙄 bloody puritans
It’s funny how many times people on Lemmy have accused Spotify of not paying artists fairly but for some reason there’s a large amount of ‘I pirate music and pay artists nothing’ that goes on around here and no one says a thing
Incoming Spotify premium plus subscription tier
That was what they were planning to do, a new premium tier that would have lots of extras but then Apple released lossless audio as part of the standard base tier so Spotify gave up on it
To me I don’t really get it, I’ve had flac audio files in the past and I haven’t really found much difference in audio quality above 192k
Just to confirm there is no new tier for this
From today (September 10), Spotify Lossless will be rolling out to Premium users across over 50 regions including the US, UK and Australia. Spotify says the rollout is starting now and will continue though October. You’ll receive a notification alerting you when Lossless is available, but that’s not all.
Surprisingly, Spotify Lossless is free for Premium subscribers – a huge sigh of relief given that previous rumors suggested that lossless audio would come in the form of a paid add-on called ‘Music Pro’.
it’s just easier to get capital
The problem is not that Europe lacks ideas or ambition. We have many talented researchers and entrepreneurs filing patents. But innovation is blocked at the next stage: we are failing to translate innovation into commercialisation, and innovative companies that want to scale up in Europe are hindered at every stage by inconsistent and restrictive regulations.
As a result, many European entrepreneurs prefer to seek financing from US venture capitalists and scale up in the US market. Between 2008 and 2021, close to 30% of the “unicorns” founded in Europe – startups that went on the be valued over USD 1 billion – relocated their headquarters abroad, with the vast majority moving to the US.
yeah seems like overall there’s more Asian but Ford Ranger is #1
https://www.racv.com.au/royalauto/transport/cars/australian-new-car-sales-2025.html
Ford Ranger ute – 28,311 (-15.6%)
Toyota HiLux ute – 26,267 (-7.9%)
Toyota RAV4 medium SUV – 24,034 (-5.4%)
Toyota LandCruiser Prado large SUV – 15,583 (+345.5%)
Isuzu D-Max ute – 14,065 (-11.1%)
Ford Everest large SUV – 12,294 (+9.0%)
Mazda CX-5 medium SUV – 11,991 (+0.6%)
Mitsubishi Outlander medium SUV – 11,399 (-21.1%)
Hyundai Kona small SUV – 11,241 (+25.6%)
Kia Sportage medium SUV – 10,558 (+0.8%)
in aus seems to be split, half want giant american tanks and others happy with chinese economy boxes
deleted by creator
that’s just spotify, i assume you would also have youtube, apple music, and bandcamp and also do live performances on top
it’s never been easy to make money in music, these guys will tell you:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=g-qkY2yj4_A
and that was the 70’s, as mentioned earlier:
In 2024, more musicians are making and releasing music than ever before. In fact, a new report has found that more music is released in a single day now than in the entire year of 1989.
the market is flooded, you’ll need to really put a lot of effort in to break out
from a climate change perspective according to this:
https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/HU/72h/hourly
way better
That is basically nothing for any artist that isn’t in the top tier of mainstream success.
Did you not read your own article you linked to?
https://simplebeen.com/artists-make-on-spotify/
You’re essentially pirating music by using Spotify
As above, you can see the payout rates in the article… a liveable wage on just Spotify alone is not equivalent to piracy which pays artists nothing, this is on top of Apple Music etc
In 2024, Spotify alone paid out a record $10 billion to the music industry—totaling nearly $60 billion since our founding.
10 billion in a year is not piracy (which is $0), are you the author of the article?
In 2024, Spotify alone paid out a record $10 billion to the music industry—totaling nearly $60 billion since our founding.
You have to remember that prior to Spotify the music industry was desperate, as people turned to downloading mp3’s illegally the music industry basically just resorted to suing people who potentially downloaded a song.
I’m also very highly sceptical of this whole article, from the crappy accounting to
Lidarr is just a tool. Like any tool, it can be misused. Yes, people could point it at less-than-legal sources
My setup uses sabnzbd integrated with Lidarr for handling downloads of content I’ve purchased
Riiiiiight.
You’re just hooked up into a piracy platform that pays artists nothing by coincidence.
On top of this:
In 2024, more musicians are making and releasing music than ever before. In fact, a new report has found that more music is released in a single day now than in the entire year of 1989.
Music simply isn’t a high value product anymore, the market is flooded, there is more music coming out per minute now than you can listen to.
But it’s all good, I’ll keep paying for Spotify because Spotify pays all the artists I listen to.
Majority of music is in albums, nearly 12,000 different tracks listened to, but most are singles, I rarely listen to albums from start to finish
I listen to a lot of music in general
https://aussie.zone/post/19441027/16055498
Also I figured out you can turn off the payola:
To opt out of receiving sponsored recommendations, go to your Spotify account on desktop > Account > Privacy settings > turn off Tailored ads.
This will opt you out of receiving sponsored recommendations and personalized ads generally across our product. If you turn off Tailored ads, you will continue receiving podcast ads in your Premium account, but they will not be tailored to you.
So even if you broke it down to me just having to buy singles I’m still getting a ridiculous amount of value from Spotify
Monthly Cost $9.99-$14.99 One-time server setup + storage
The problem is that’s not the monthly cost because (in addition to running a server not being a one time thing, they need maintenance) it’s not including the cost to actually buy all the music:
Digital purchases (Bandcamp, iTunes, Amazon, etc.)
For me:
https://www.last.fm/user/ikt123/listening-report/year
Paying for 7808 albums in 1 year is unfeasible, so this is not a replacement for Spotify for me, it could be though if you only listen to a tiny amount of music, at current rate of $15 a month for me, it’s equal to like 1 album and like several smaller singles, if this is all you listen to in a month go for it.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
That’s unreal, I cannot believe how quick some of these governments open fire on their own citizens and expect no response
deleted by creator
Replacing all jobs won’t create true abundance because the resources required to create things are finite, namely land and space in general
We’ll have solved these problems though, space wise whether it be by reducing ones footprint down to practically nothing, with nanobots ensuring our bodies get fully taken care of or through expansion to other planets
Resource wise we’ll simply be using fully renewable resources, we’re talking end game here, all jobs are being done by computers, there is nothing left for us to do but have fun or babies? I duno what we’d do if all jobs were fully completed and there was literally no work left
It’s also difficult to say how these problems will be solved without coming across like “it’s the future!”
Paintings reveal what people in 1900 thought the year 2000 would look like
https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/paintings-future-1900-2000-b1916391.html
Although the provenance of the rule is unclear, it is sometimes said to have originated in France.[81] The rule appears in John Fox Jr.'s 1903 novel The Little Shepherd of Kingdom Come,[84] in American newspapers in 1931 attributed to Maurice Chevalier,[85] and in The Autobiography of Malcolm X, attributed to Elijah Muhammad.[86]
In many early sources, the rule was primarily presented as a formula to calculate the ideal age of a female partner at the beginning of a heterosexual relationship. Frederick Locker-Lampson’s Patchwork from 1879 states the opinion “A wife should be half the age of her husband with seven years added.”[87] Max O’Rell’s Her Royal Highness Woman from 1901 gives the rule in the format “A man should marry a woman half his age, plus seven.”[88]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_disparity_in_sexual_relationships