CarmineCatboy2 [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 580 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 8th, 2024

help-circle
  • Several breeds of hunting dogs were developed by and for the working class — hell the entire German breeding program was designed specifically for the working class hunter. The Russian Spaniel was developed specially to be a hunting dogs adapted to urban apartment life. The fucking Epagneul Breton traces its roots to French peasants who bred and kept small, less conspicuous dogs for the purpose of poaching game from the estates of the French nonility. Hunting and hunting dogs are inexorably linked with the working class.

    You know who cares about the historical pedigree of the ‘working class dogs’? Real leftists who, in true american fashion, live a well equipped suburban lifestyle while cosplaying as medieval poachers.

    Unlike you I am not going to claim to be rural myself but I did live in a sparsely populated town for a third of my life. Half of our residents - around 30k people at the time - engaged in subsistence farming and hunting. They grew and processed manioc artisanally, which means they were dirt poor and could make use of the undeclared commons all around us to round out their diets.

    The idea that hunting isn’t extractive is an alien one to me, given that our people engaged in it in order to survive. Hunting wasn’t a sport to them - and they sure as shit don’t know anything about the Epagneul Breton. Nor was it even a tradition (another concern of true leftists), as the moment things improved financially they became more focused on farming than on passing their hunting skills to their kids.


  • None of South America’s countries have even regional tier capacity to project power. Hell, we don’t even have power projection across all of our territories.

    What has historically happened in the past is that neighboring countries try to help economies stay afloat via contraband and transshipment. It’s what Brazil’s dictatorship did to keep Argentina from collapsing during the Falklands War and its the best you can hope from even from an ideologically committed government in Brasília or Bogotá.

    This is doomerist but had anybody gone to bat for Iraq in the early 2000s then all it would have meant is that countries like Libya, Syria, Lebanon and so on would have been destroyed earlier than projected. Its inhumane, it is cruel but even if all 400 million south americans saluted the courage of the Yemeni people, they’d still rather live in Saudi or UAE than Sanaa.

    Nevermind the afterglow of the Jakarta Method as applied to South America - we have comprador elites in Brazil, but even those understand that their bottomline at this point requires a tough stance towards the USA and a concilliatory stance towards China. No, none of us can actually fight an invasion of Venezuela without being bombed into statehood failure ourselves. And that’s assuming we can even deploy there.








  • It is Socialism with Chinese characteristics.

    I think this is a non starter rethorically because you’re making a rather subtle point. You’re not arguing that there are no things in China which a normie would identify with western capitalism, you’re the biggest accuser of Chinese neoliberalism. Nor are you arguing the reverse. You’re saying, if I’m not mistaken, that the government is still at the top of things and is at a crossroads when it comes to dealing with the ongoing characteristics: re-centralize development, cede power to the privates or, more likely, some combination of the two.

    I say this is a non-starter rethorically because ‘Socialism with Chinese characteristics’ is a phrase used in the west with a bit a smirk, its the Chinese pretending they are still socialist.