FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agoI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1163arrow-down11
arrow-up1162arrow-down1imageI know writers who use subtext and they're all cowards.hexbear.netFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 days agoThe negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
minus-squarefrauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 days ago…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now
The negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually “domtext”
…Damn! Y’know you on some quantum shit right now