I want to believe that, whether intentionally or unintentionally, they’re forging the material conditions for revolution to be successful. Even if they don’t go full commie in a few decades (as they should in my opinion, shifting progressively from market socialism to a democratically centrally computationally planned economy with social ownership of the means of production), the existence of a multipolar world with china on one side is already incredibly more beneficial than US hegemony.
Oh I agree. Not fully though, there are definitely some negative side effects, this isn’t paradise, such things don’t exist in this world. But netto it’s a good thing.
If the west wanted Africa for themselves, they should’ve done something about that. China is doing something about it. Good for China and good for Africa.
The funniest thing is all these “blocked by an instance filter for hexbear.net” responses. They’re like clockwork. XD
Not fully though, there are definitely some negative side effects, this isn’t paradise, such things don’t exist in this world.
All the negative side effects of having hospitals, schools, roads, and other infastructure - its straight out of Heart of Darkness - “the horror, the horror.”
I know they can’t see this so, just between us - i hate how libs are like well “its not paradise, such things don’t exist in this world.” So because communist can’t do things perfectly (which we don’t claim to) then what we do is probably worse than what the liberals do. Or maybe they mean something like “you naive socialist think its perfect - but perfect doesn’t exist kiddo” bet Marx failed to consider that. either way its huge energy. Libs think they’re are the only ones to ever think before
The west is desperate to paint it that way, but what justification is there for calling this colonialism? “Debt-trap diplomacy” was the line before, but that didn’t hold up to scrutiny, especially when China outright forgave several African countries’ debts.
Yeah its strange how the West always tries to brand this colonialism since it obviously isnt. You would have to be a dumbass propaganda brained piece of shit to believe this is colonialism- especially while the US still practices the modern equivalent to this day.
This is obviously not just rebranded colonialism.
deleted by creator
Indeed
China is doing so much good in the world. It gives me hope that humanity will survive and communism will win
I want to believe that, whether intentionally or unintentionally, they’re forging the material conditions for revolution to be successful. Even if they don’t go full commie in a few decades (as they should in my opinion, shifting progressively from market socialism to a democratically centrally computationally planned economy with social ownership of the means of production), the existence of a multipolar world with china on one side is already incredibly more beneficial than US hegemony.
Projection at it’s finest, I’m looking at you IMF
Oh I agree. Not fully though, there are definitely some negative side effects, this isn’t paradise, such things don’t exist in this world. But netto it’s a good thing.
If the west wanted Africa for themselves, they should’ve done something about that. China is doing something about it. Good for China and good for Africa.
The funniest thing is all these “blocked by an instance filter for hexbear.net” responses. They’re like clockwork. XD
Literally proud of the echo chamber
Not that you can see this reply, but this was literally crossposted to our news comm, soup for brains.
All the negative side effects of having hospitals, schools, roads, and other infastructure - its straight out of Heart of Darkness - “the horror, the horror.”
I know they can’t see this so, just between us - i hate how libs are like well “its not paradise, such things don’t exist in this world.” So because communist can’t do things perfectly (which we don’t claim to) then what we do is probably worse than what the liberals do. Or maybe they mean something like “you naive socialist think its perfect - but perfect doesn’t exist kiddo” bet Marx failed to consider that.
either way its huge 
energy. Libs think they’re are the only ones to ever think before
The west is desperate to paint it that way, but what justification is there for calling this colonialism? “Debt-trap diplomacy” was the line before, but that didn’t hold up to scrutiny, especially when China outright forgave several African countries’ debts.
So what’s the line now?
Yeah its strange how the West always tries to brand this colonialism since it obviously isnt. You would have to be a dumbass propaganda brained piece of shit to believe this is colonialism- especially while the US still practices the modern equivalent to this day.
yeah the neat thing is that developing the countries the US empire depends on exploitating directly undermines neocolonialism.
Kinda weird for a colonizer to forgive so many loans they make to the colonized but I guess that 500d Mahjong or something.
Of course it’s not, glad you agree.