• NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Democrats have had YEARS to endorse anyone who was born after the Battle of the Bulge. With the election less than 4 months away, it is WAY too late to pick Biden’s successor.

    They need to come with a campaign message that shows ordinary people why Biden is a better choice than Trump, which should be the easiest g*ddamn thing in the world.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Democrat “voters” haven’t had a choice. It’s the Democrat party that has pushed for Biden so hard and not allowed any opportunity for voters to choice someone else before now.

      The democratic party wants Biden as president.

      I suspect the majority of Democrat voters do not want him to run again.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Democrat voters” “Democrat party”

        I asked about this curious phrasing in this comment - what’s your take on it? Why do you think there might be a notable overlap between the users who are so fed up with the Democratic Party that they’re against Biden, and the users who even though they are obviously left wing people, use a traditionally conservative turn of phrase?

        • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I happen to be in this thread due to bouncing around, so I’ll explain anytime I use Democrat/Democratic/Republican:

          I’ve had various liberals tell me Democrat was a form of dog whistle or sign I’m a right winger. One person started to dig into my mutual aid info trying to figure out if I was a Russian bot because I said “Democrat” instead of Democratic. I’ve tried to Democratic as a noun, and it felt grammatically incorrect. “I’m running as a Democatic.” “The current majority in the house is with the Democratics.”

          Personally I think “Democrat” works for both candidate, party, and voter. “Biden is the Democrat’s Nominee” vs “Biden is the Democratic nominee”.

          I have no idea if one is better than the other, but I tend to use one over the other when needed.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve tried to Democratic as a noun, and it felt grammatically incorrect. “I’m running as a Democatic.” "The current majority in the house is with the Democratics.”

            Well that sure is a totally normal human explanation.

            • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Am I missing something here? I’ve had people say that I had to use that word otherwise I’m somehow on the payroll for the Republicans.

              I do acknowledge that “Democrat” has been a form of… for lack of a better word, slur from Republican weirdos.

              • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Serious explanation: “Democrat” as a noun is normal. “I’m running as a Democrat.” “The current majority in the house in with the Democrats.”

                “Democratic” as an adjective is normal. “Democratic Party.”

                “Democrat” as an adjective is super weird. I think it was originally intended as a slur, but to me it just sounds weird, like bad grammar. “Democrat Party.” Almost no one uses it that way except conservatives, because no one who doesn’t consume conservative media would even run across it.

                I found your explanation very bizarre because something like “I’m running as a Democratic” is something I’ve never heard in my life. If someone actually did tell you that “Democrat” is a bad thing even as a noun, there was some severe miscommunication on someone’s part.

                Apologies for being sarcastic about it

                Edit: Welp, I looked over the history for the user I was talking to, and now I feel silly for thinking maybe they were actually confused somehow, and trying to help them. They’re just trying to obfuscate the original issue by introducing this nonsensical straw man of “I’m running as a Democratic,” I think, and I’m naive enough that I bought into it enough to give them a straight answer on it.

                • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  It doesn’t help I’m running short on sleep, autistic, and just not in a good mood today before the assassination attempt.

                  But yeah, I personally go “Democratic Party” for the party but a member of Congress is a Democrat. I’m registered Democratic Party, I am a Democrat, yadda yadda.

                  I found your explanation very bizarre because something like “I’m running as a Democratic” is something I’ve never heard in my life. If someone actually did tell you that “Democrat” is a bad thing even as a noun, there was some severe miscommunication on someone’s part.

                  Maybe, I just recall them claiming I was a fake American for doing it, and then saying my Polish friend was a form of Russian agent because he was born and lives in Poland. I can try to find the post but that was months ago.

                  Thank you for taking the time to explain it, Mozz.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The establishment has been keeping his mental decline as secret as possible for quite some time now. They had the time and squandered it. Now the narrative of is he fit for the presidency is going to dominate any other factor to the election. If I’m being honest with myself, he’s done. We’re just currently salvaging as much as we can and push the never-trump narrative hard and pray.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s annoying that most everyone can understand this, but the media keeps pretending like it’s an open question.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because they are pushing a narrative. They aren’t being honest that no one is prepared to take over, no one else has been campaigning. Even if people wanted a replacement, there isn’t one ready to take on the mantle.

        They are intentionally sowing discord.