Maxxus@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 年前[Moldy Monday] I Have Friends Rulemedia.kbin.runimagemessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down11file-text
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1image[Moldy Monday] I Have Friends Rulemedia.kbin.runMaxxus@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 年前message-square175fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRandomgal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Because the feelings of the people who would be affected negatively by progress are as valid as yours.
minus-squareGlitchington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Okay but if progress means validating people who are made to feel invalid by a lack of progress, we’re just in the tolerance paradox with different words.
minus-squareRandomgal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Yeah, notice how you are now talking like “them”.
minus-squareMutilationWave@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Who would be affected negatively by progress but the extremely wealthy?
![[Moldy Monday] I Have Friends Rule](https://media.kbin.run/22/4d/224d61d35b90894e9f602eb7887c1b71e80ebcf262d1ef50db6acbb2dc269a38.jpg){kind=link}
Because the feelings of the people who would be affected negatively by progress are as valid as yours.
Okay but if progress means validating people who are made to feel invalid by a lack of progress, we’re just in the tolerance paradox with different words.
Yeah, notice how you are now talking like “them”.
Like who?
Who would be affected negatively by progress but the extremely wealthy?