• GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    A war between NATO and Russia would kill millions of people in minutes. I don’t think it would be a smart move.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s like 4 years into a 3 day “special operation.” What makes you think Russia could do well against better armed nations, let alone NATO.

          • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well, that was only being used to reinforce my point. Even if it’s not true, it’s still 4 years into a war with a much smaller country. The rest of comment still stands. Russia would certainly do worse against better armed nations or NATO.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              It’s 4 years into a war with the entire industrial and financial power of NATO using a the people of Ukraine to fight Russia. All the weapons in Ukraine are NATO weapons and they’re being defeated in Ukraine. Don’t take my word for it though, here’s what NYT has to say on the subject https://archive.ph/ThjaB

              • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                I know they aren’t exactly fighting on their own, but it’s also not the same as fighting NATO directly. Somehow you keep missing the point.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Seems to me that you’re the one missing the point. Ukrainians use NATO weapons, but their actual skill in fighting is far higher than that of NATO armies that haven’t seen combat. In a recent NATO exercise, 10 Ukrainians wiped out two NATO battalions in 24h with drones, NATO troops couldn’t even locate the launch points. So, Russia is fighting a superior army to that of NATO that’s using best NATO equipment.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          whos ammo stockpile that cant be replenished cos lack of productive forces and that could be used right now in the ME has been destroyed in the last few years? russia or us empire? you libs think wars are won by beign fast. you think this is fucking CS when you win by points. search war of attrition you might learn a concept or two.

        • limer@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          It seems technology has once again made it easy to create military stalemates regardless of the nations fighting.

          This seems like a hard lesson to learn for many in different countries. Perhaps those obstinate generals of World War One, those that ordered failed assaults, should be looked at differently, and not judged so harshly as history has.

          Because people seem to just do this

        • DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The operation taking longer is exactly because NATO got involved. Now Russia switched to a war of attrition and making sure they don’t take on too many losses while they are also going to collapse the Ukrinazi state and forcing the EU and their bloodthirsty liberals to eat the cost of having thrown ukrainian men into the meat grinder.

          The tactics and equipment used and destroyed are already NATO. The lifes lost, however, are not.

    • DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Only US” and a bunch of european countries and some asian one’s as well. Them not officially declaring war, does not mean they are not involved.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just because they are not participating directly doesn’t mean they are not involved. Nato countries assit with intel and sanctions to weaken iran capacity to defend itself

        • mrdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Who said I am addressing the headline? I addressed your own point that this is only the US war and not NATO while Nato is involved in non direct military action . Non direct military support is still very valuable in war