• SickSemper [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    People in the Zeteo comments section were saying “I’m so glad we finally have a politician who doesn’t dodge the question and answers directly” and I sincerely wonder if we’re watching the same interview. He was asked about tisch, same as here

    • lib1 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      17 hours ago

      He was also asked directly if police would stop ICE raids and responded that they wouldn’t be instructed to help them. The weasel word bullshit is maddening, especially when people fall for it

      • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Despite how cool it would be, wouldn’t ordering the NYPD to apprehend ICE agents be a direct act of sedition aka grounds for the military to invade the city?

        People are gonna protect their own heads first no matter their politics.

      • MarxMadness [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That particular part doesn’t strike me as weasel wording. There’s a world of difference between:

        • Committing to police stopping ICE raids, which would involve ordering the police to directly confront ICE agents; and
        • Committing to police not helping, which does not involve direct confrontation.
        • SickSemper [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          When cops show up between ice and protestors, we know who they’re protecting. LAPD are technically “not assisting” ICE, but they sure as hell when they stand by, hands on holsters, while people are snatched off the streets