return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 14 hours agoMegyn Kelly questions whether Jeffrey Epstein's desire for “very young teen types” made him a pedophilewww.mediamatters.orgexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up181arrow-down15cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up176arrow-down1external-linkMegyn Kelly questions whether Jeffrey Epstein's desire for “very young teen types” made him a pedophilewww.mediamatters.orgreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 14 hours agomessage-square20fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squarethemeatbridge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down3·14 hours agoThis is one of those technical distinctions where if you’re making the distinction, you’re already on the wrong side of everything.
minus-squareStinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·edit-22 hours agoPsychology and precision in language using the diagnostic terminology of the DSM V is on the wrong side of everything? No one is excusing or belittling anything. People who hurt children must fry.
minus-squarethemeatbridge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 minutes agoYeah, if you’re quoting the DSM V to defend yourself as technically not a pedophile, then yes you’ve crossed the rubicon of decency.
This is one of those technical distinctions where if you’re making the distinction, you’re already on the wrong side of everything.
Psychology and precision in language using the diagnostic terminology of the DSM V is on the wrong side of everything?
No one is excusing or belittling anything. People who hurt children must fry.
Yeah, if you’re quoting the DSM V to defend yourself as technically not a pedophile, then yes you’ve crossed the rubicon of decency.