• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    But the party didn’t monopolize power, when it took power from the soviets? O.o

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The party took the decision making power from the soviets. Or at least from any soviets not loyal to them. Wait a sec, gonna relisten to the podcast describing this.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          They didn’t, though. The closest is disempowering anti-socialist soviets, but the soviet system remained until the end of the USSR and was the basis of its democratic structure. Soviet Democracy by Pat Sloan and This Soviet World by Anna Louise Strong go over it (moreso the first). Is The Red Flag Flying? by Albert Syzmanski is a good one on the economic model of the soviet union, particularly it’s later era.

          Between 1924 and 1936, lower elected representatives were done so directly, with higher rungs elected by the elected. After the 1936 constitution, upper levels were directly elected:

          The soviet union itself was a federated, multi-national group of socialist republics. The CPSU was powerful, but by consent of the people, who supported the party and the socialist system throughout its existence.