• Acamon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 天前

    I’m not sure you’re interpreting that phrase in the way other people are. I think the standard interpretation of “ignorance is not an excuse” is “not being aware of a crime being illegal is not a legitimate defence if you commit that crime”.

    You seem to be thinking more about freedom of information, or education?

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      It’s a legitimate defense to some crimes. For example, in Texas it’s illegal to own more than 6 dildos.

    • √𝛂𝛋𝛆@piefed.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 天前

      It is just a higher level of abstraction with the overlying ethical principles and morality, like a conversation with an autocrat where their word is law.

      • Acamon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        But what do you actually mean by “ignorance is no excuse”? You said that any system other tah democracy conflicts with the statement. But the standard meaning (the fact that you didn’t realise you were breaking the law isn’t an meaningful excuse in court) absolutely applies in autocracies or whatever. The point is certain actions are illegal and doing them will get you in trouble, whether you knew in advance or not.

        I feel like you’ve got another meaning in mind, can you try and express it clearly?