- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
As Trump calls for National Guard deployments across the U.S., a small contingent of Ohio guard members has been quietly expressing concern in an encrypted group chat.
The administration started sending troops into several Democratic-led cities this summer, citing the need to crack down on violent crime and protect federal immigration facilities. The Ohio guard members now say they’re alarmed at the turn the country is taking. They’re even questioning their potential role in it.
“I really went to a dark place when they sent the troops to [Los Angeles], and then eventually [Washington, D.C.], and now, Chicago. This is just not what any of us signed up for, and it’s so out of the scope of normal operations,” says J, a member of the Ohio National Guard who spoke to NPR on condition of anonymity.


I may be wrong here but at this point and without Trump evoking the insourction act, can’t the guard by law object to any deployment under the “posse comitatus” doctrine?
Yes, but they generally don’t want to outright refuse an order. The reason their involvement is so limited is because the generals have talked Trump down from full martial law to just accompanying ICE.
But courts have ruled the that some are a violation of posse comitatus: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ylyd9lkkqo