SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoturing completenesssopuli.xyzimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1965arrow-down127
arrow-up1938arrow-down1imageturing completenesssopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day agoSince when do they pass the Turing test? They’re infuriatingly bad.
minus-squarevodka@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up21·1 day agoEven the first version of ChatGPT passed turing tests. It takes surprisingly little for an LLM to make natural language responses that are indistinguishable from a human. Especially when factual accuracy was never part of it.
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 day agoConsidering how easy they were to break by saying “ignore previous instructions” I’ma have to disagree
minus-squarevodka@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·23 hours agoI’m sure that’d work on some humans too.
minus-squarepotoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·22 hours agoDon’t listen to this guy.
Since when do they pass the Turing test? They’re infuriatingly bad.
Even the first version of ChatGPT passed turing tests.
It takes surprisingly little for an LLM to make natural language responses that are indistinguishable from a human. Especially when factual accuracy was never part of it.
Considering how easy they were to break by saying “ignore previous instructions” I’ma have to disagree
I’m sure that’d work on some humans too.
Don’t listen to this guy.