• pingveno@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s going to have to be part of it, but it can’t be all of it. There isn’t enough money in the upper class to take care of all of the debt, and at a certain level of taxation they will just move. I will speak in favor of increasing taxes on around pretty much every individual making over 100k or couple making over 200k. For a single person working 40 hours a week in the US, that is the 77th percentile. My husband and I are in this position and I think starting the additional tax burden with us would be fair.

    I don’t see raising taxes much below us as being very productive, and those “flat tax” people can fuck right off. That group is already paying money into entitlements so the oft repeated statement that half of households pay no income tax is misleading. They’re really struggling right now, so I just don’t see an increase in taxes as productive.

        • pingveno@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, 200k and DINK. I want to have my taxes raised, just as long as others like me also have have their taxes raised.

      • pingveno@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with doing that is that people then get more hesitant about putting money into a country. Would you invest in a country if there’s a good chance its leadership is just going to do an about face and tax your wealth into nothing? Take your possessions? It’s part of the reason why many countries struggle to get foreign investment. Their past has caused businesses to have little faith that investments won’t just get nationalized by the government.