UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 18 hours agoMamdani Winning Juice Rulepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down154file-text
arrow-up115arrow-down1imageMamdani Winning Juice Rulepiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneUnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFrezik@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·17 hours agoBut how is that in any way compatible with libertarianism? I presume not “libertarian” in the old sense of anarchism. Even that doesn’t particularly like electoral politics at all.
minus-squareUnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down15·17 hours agoI don’t have to agree with everything Mamdani says to realize that the establishment Democrat party is incapable of standing up to this administration. Hence the whole political pluralism thing.
minus-squarestenAanden@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·16 hours agoLibertarians are overwhelmingly siding with republicans. Doesn’t that mean anything?
minus-squareUnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down10·16 hours agoUh no. Does the USSR mean anything when talking to an anarchist? Trans rights are human rights Free Palestine. Abolish ICE. That any clearer for you?
But how is that in any way compatible with libertarianism?
I presume not “libertarian” in the old sense of anarchism. Even that doesn’t particularly like electoral politics at all.
I don’t have to agree with everything Mamdani says to realize that the establishment Democrat party is incapable of standing up to this administration. Hence the whole political pluralism thing.
Libertarians are overwhelmingly siding with republicans. Doesn’t that mean anything?
Uh no. Does the USSR mean anything when talking to an anarchist?
Trans rights are human rights Free Palestine. Abolish ICE.
That any clearer for you?