• AGM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Don’t get your hopes up. McGinty was on CBC two days ago talking about deepening integration with the US in intelligence, security, and defense. He said he thought Canada’s cooperation should remain “unshaken” despite everything that has happened.

  • Scotty@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This is the same rubbish that is published in Europe and elsewhere. The most obvious issue with this article is that it doesn’t even mention the rising threats by countries like Russia and China (Russia is spending around 8-10% of its GPD, or 40% of its public budget, for military. Numbers for China are hard to guess as the official data is not very reliable).

    You can’t publish such an opinion without even mentioning the rising threats.

    “To make sense, defence spending has to be linked to needs, not GDP.”

    Yeah, exactly. And the needs are increasing.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Canada has also been threatened to be annexed by its neighbour with a particularly notorious military. Even if its just dementia riddled ramblings, Canada should be becoming more defense independent.

      • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Exactly. We do need more defense spending but it should be a domestic drone industry and a civil defense program, to have us ready to fight off any adventurism from our fascist neighbours and protect the population from climate change catastrophes.

        • Scotty@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The US is really becoming more and more authoritarian, but your fixation on the US while ignoring all other authoritarian and fascist threats is telling.

  • SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    In the linked article this one references it says that target is in 10 years. But also Canada hasn’t had a very good track record of hitting the NATO spending targets.

    I also imagine Carney by probability is long gone then.

    Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada and its NATO allies have agreed to substantially hike their defence-spending target to five per cent of annual GDP by 2035.

    Will also point out the Liberals is suppose to table the next budget in Nov.4.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Carney will not survive the next election. The Cons were set to win until anti-Trump sentiment swayed us to Carney’s “elbows up” talk.

      But he put those elbows down real fast.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If I’m reading these numbers correctly, that proposed $150 billion would be roughly 33% of last year’s estimated total federal government spending. More like 50% of what they were spending before the current era of massive deficits.

    Not all Canadians will be worse off as a result. Some are shareholders of the giant American defence contractors.