Last week, China’s Ministry of Commerce published a document that went by the name of “announcement No. 62 of 2025”.
But this wasn’t just any bureaucratic missive. It has rocked the fragile tariffs truce with the US.
The announcement detailed sweeping new curbs on its rare earth exports, in a move that tightens Beijing’s grip on the global supply of the critical minerals - and reminded Donald Trump just how much leverage China holds in the trade war.
China has a near-monopoly in the processing of rare earths - crucial for the production of everything from smartphones to fighter jets.
So that capability and competency is domestic. The competitive edge is in being independent.
It would also be very cheap if local production were held to the same environmental and labour standards as it is there.
If we are fine with others shouldering the environmental and labour burdens for our cheap products, we should be fine with doing it ourselves.
If we are not, we should not be buying products that don’t adhere to our standards.
then the entire western economy would collapse.
Indeed. That’s also very telling. The entire Western market is built on offloading undesirable waste, labour practices to ‘out of sight, out of mind’.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I’m not sure if you’ve been in the materials industry for long, but the margins aren’t all that large there, and much of it is used to mitigate risk in the heavily fluctuating market.
As a known .ml hater, nah man — they’re right. What you’re suggesting is extremely hypocritical. Do you realize how much better the U.S.’ current circumstances would be if instead of offshoring all of our factories we 1) held them to stronger environmental safety standards 2) didn’t fucking close them. Actually, the world would likely be much better off.
We’re in this mess because a shitload of people have willfully ignored the real cost of having their supermarket packed with meat 100% of the time, no exceptions. The real cost, 17.42 megatonnes of Co2 in 2022, from iPhone production alone. The real cost of their freedoms being paid for in blood and sweat from Chinese/Indian and 3rd world sweatshops.
So, yes, if we’re unwilling to shoulder environmental and labour burdens for our products — we should not have those products.