For me it’s probably speech therapy and everything pertaining to that. I’m yet to encounter someone on here who is one apart from me (in training).

What about you?

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Graded Modal Dependent Type Theory, but that’s mostly because only “dozens of” people know it exists.

    • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      What kind of grading do you give there? I guess the modal part is about the contexts for the type theory, but it has been some time I have looked into it.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 minutes ago

        I think “graded” in the name is there in contrast to “quantitative” type theory, which doesn’t have modalities/quantities at the type-level.

        The “modal” is borrowed from modal logic. If you pick the correct semiring, you can recover linearity and affine-ity and the other substructural logic pieces.

        The quantitative semiring I’ve been working with is 0, 1, ?, n, +, *, which I think will let me use static analysis to do very precise non-strictness and precise/early resource tracking/release. (But, my progress is so slow, that if this were an academic project, I don’t think I’d be getting any more grant funding.)