• Gonzako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Nah, I’d like to un-see recursion. It was way overblown on uni, I barely ever use it.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Recursion is amazing for a small selection of problems. Most of the time you don’t need, or want, it. When it is useful though, it tends to be really useful.

      I don’t understand people’s issue with it. I always found it easy. Maybe that’s why I feel this way. Maybe if you find it challenging you want to avoid it, even when it’s a good solution.

      • kamstrup@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don’t support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think, their point (and also my experience) is that you get taught about it in university a lot more than about simple loops, so it feels more important even though you rarely use it in reality.

        Same thing goes for linked lists and inheritance…

      • kamstrup@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don’t support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution