• shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      OP’s an ass, but reading is a very different sort of stimulation, and I think reading is more valuable to one’s brain health. Some can’t read and derive enjoyment, and that’s fine, but reading is nonetheless helpful to stimulate that part of our brains.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I can see that, and if they hadn’t been a dipshit from the start acting all superior, I would have been far more receptive to their point.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You’re mostly right, but gods you’re an asshole. That working out for you?

      • GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Please note that I mention nothing about feelings.

        Are you saying that listening does not require the brain? No language comprehension? No imagination? No critical thinking?

        Or maybe they simply stimulate different parts of the brain? At different intensities, sure, but stimulation nonetheless?

        • reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          If you’re misinterpreting my usage of “stimulation” as “enjoyment” or “engagement”, which you were, by the looks, then those are feelings.

          If you were interpreting me accurately, and yet still dispute the fact that reading is magnitudes more engaging cognitively, and that the original post was about cognitive decline, which cannot be fixed with a stopgap like audiobooks? Then you’re an idiot. Plain and simple.

          • GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            So you’re saying stimulation is being misrepresented as engagement; then in the next paragraph says, “reading is magnitudes more engaging” to support your argument about stimulation? Or is my cognitively addled brain misreading your comment?

            Instead of name-calling, which is usually a sign someone has no good argument, I’ll just drop a link to this paper that used fMRI to scan the brain when presented with information in either audio or written form.

            although the representation of semantic information in the human brain is quite complex, the semantic representations evoked by listening versus reading are almost identical.

            Thank you for engaging like a mature adult.

            EDIT: Or this one that shows that both activities simply activate different parts of the brain. And I would argue that brain activation is stimulation. Unless you’d like to present an alternative definition for stimulation?