• blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago
    • Spending a day or more every quarter/half sorting out your roadmap, prioritising stakeholder needs, tech debt and enhancements
    • Someone from senior leadership decides they want random thing they invented and blows the roadmap up
    • Much wanted feature (X) or issue gets pushed back
    • CEO makes a comment in a company wide meeting how they can’t understand why we simply can’t do X thing yet
    • Everyone in Product scrambles to make X a priority
    • Go to step 1
    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      21 hours ago

      My company used to do SAFe, which is supposed to be “scalable agile”. By “scalable”, they mean you take up half a sprint every quarter to do a big waterfall plan.

      Too many in management believed their jobs depended on keeping this system. We slowly whittled them away until we stopped doing it entirely. Whatever you might think about “Extreme Programming” or “Agile” being primarily a way to sell books and overpriced training seminars, SAFe is only that. It has no other purpose.

      • dermanus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        We have SAFe at my office too. It seems to me that it’s just a way to say you’re agile while still being waterfall.