TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 个月前In this dire time ...startrek.websiteimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1118arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1117arrow-down1imageIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteTribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 个月前message-square15fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 个月前Also, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument. If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 个月前Exactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 个月前No, that would be an and hominem.
Also, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument.
If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
Exactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
No, that would be an and hominem.