Is this not the reason the second amendment exists? Regards An Australian Edit: I’m not advocating for violence. More so “a well regulated militia” which could be established by protesters or Democratic Governors for genuine self defence.

  • Badabinski@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The No Kings protest in Utah ended tragically because armed “peacekeepers” (aka armed civilians) shot at a protester who was open-carrying an AR-15 at the protest. The protester had no ill intentions, but the peacekeepers didn’t know that. The peacekeepers missed and killed a bystander.

    That’s why you don’t open carry at protests. The untrained “good guy with a gun” is likely to shoot you. Carry concealed if you’re going to carry, or don’t bring a gun at all.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s not accurate.

      The person shot and killed (Mr. Ah-loo) was unarmed. He was struck by a round fired at someone (mr. Gamboa) who had snuck out of the protest and returned with an AR-15.

      Gamboa was arrested for attempted murder, and the person who fired the shot is/was being investigated, but has not been arrested/charged at this time

    • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure. But protest organizers have a responsibility to create a clear policy and communicate this policy in an open carry state, and they also have a responsibility to properly vet any people that do communicate that they will attend with a firearm.

      The volunteer open carry person was not trained, and was not given any instruction as simple as “return fire only” or “do not shoot first”.