• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    He ain’t wrong. But there’s still a big question of what he’s going to do about it.

    Will the Chicago PD defend its citizens from this unlawful armed incursion? Will the Illinois National Guard step up? Can the citizens defend themselves from this authoritarian violence? And will Pritzker lead his people in opposition to a military occupation of their largest city?

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I think he should dispatch Illinois National Guard units for each Federal officer in his city, 1:1. Their only orders should be to trail ICE and other officers with body cams. Do not do anything else. Stream it online, on real time. Make sure people know what is happening.

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        23 hours ago

        There’s a section in the IL constitution that creates a “state guard,” which can be activated by the governor, separate from National Guard.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is not an “Immigration Crackdown,” this is an invasion of your own peaceful city. Patrolling tourist areas is only trying to hurt the city.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No. They said he can activate the NG but they can only protect federal buildings which is why everywhere they’re deployed they’re just circling around a handful of buildings.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Paywall, if you want to support the times provide the relevant text and we can talk about it though what is available before the block specifically says it isn’t final quick means its lawfulness is indeterminate.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It means the racial profiling got a rubber stamp, and “we will figure out the legality later.”

            No one is saying they determined it was legal. They simply hand waved the issue in the short term.

            Think of it like this. If cops started arresting people for saying “I don’t like cheese” and the cases got to the Supreme Court, and they said “nah it’s all good keep doing it until we hear arguments on it” that would be akin to what happened here.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I’m sorry, did they say “no you have to stop” or did they say “yeah you can keep going” because only one of those happened.

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I’m sorry that just isn’t how the legal system in this country works.

                  Even if the court said “come on stop it guys” it would have no legal force until it’s clearly established which is generally after finality ie. all appeals are exhausted or expired.

    • forrcaho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The ICE campaign of terror is not a distraction, in the sense that it is meant to draw attention away from something else. It is a primary ambition – perhaps the primary ambition – of this administration. Remember those “MASS DEPORTATION NOW” signs people were holding up at the Republican National Convention?

      It is also unsympathetic to those being abused by ICE to call their plight a “distraction”. No! It’s something we need to pay attention to and put a stop to!