Image is of the Freedom Band performing at the end of the Second National Congress of the Socialist Movement of Ghana, sourced from this article. The same article contains most of the information used in the preamble below.


A little over a week ago, the Socialist Movement of Ghana concluded its second National Delegates Congress in Aburi, gathering 300 delegates from across the country. There, they deepened their commitment to the working class of Ghana and committed to intensifying political education and organization at the grassroots. The SMG itself decided to not electorally contest the 2024 elections in Ghana, but still presented a manifesto, and nonetheless managed to get two SMG members parliamentary seats in the National Democratic Congress.

Anyway, back to the National Delegates Congress: the delegates agreed that the Western imperialist system is now under a profound crisis, in which the likely future is a heightening of brutality, chaos, and resource plundering - a future which must be resisted and organized against.

To summarize their various statements and condemnations:

  • Inside Ghana: a commitment to women’s rights, youth empowerment, and environmental protection.
  • A condemnation of the resource plundering of the Democratic Republic of the Congo by imperialist powers.
  • A salute to the people of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, in their campaign against outside imperial control in the Sahel.
  • A condemnation of Morocco’s illegal occupation of the Western Sahara, and a call for the UN to identify the independence of the Sahwari people.
  • A strong condemnation of Israel’s genocidal atrocities and massive terrorist operations against nearby countries, and support for Palestinian independence.
  • Support for the people of Haiti against outside imperial domination.
  • A call for the end of the blockade on Cuba and their removal from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list.
  • Solidarity with Maduro and the people of Venezuela against the United States.
  • A rejection of all imperialist aggression and sanctions against Iran.
  • A condemnation of NATO’s decades-long military expansion eastwards towards Russia, especially as it has now resulted in massive devastation and risks a third world war.
  • And finally, a commitment to Pan Africanism and international solidarity with all oppressed peoples around the world.

A platform I think we all can agree to!


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    https://archive.ph/07UCv

    Russian missile upgrade outpaces Ukraine’s Patriot defences

    Kyiv’s interception rates fall as enemy strikes dodge US interceptors in final seconds

    more

    Months of devastating Russian air attacks suggest Moscow has succeeded in altering its missiles to evade Ukraine’s air defences, according to Ukrainian and western officials. Bombardments that targeted Ukrainian drone makers this summer were a prominent example of Russia improving its ballistic missiles to better defeat US Patriot batteries, current and former Ukrainian and western officials told the Financial Times. Russia was likely to have modified its Iskander-M mobile system, which launches missiles with an estimated range of up to 500km, as well as Kinzhal air-launched ballistic missiles, which can fly up to 480km, they added. The missiles now follow a typical trajectory before diverting and plunging into a steep terminal dive or executing manoeuvres that “confuse and avoid” Patriot interceptors.

    It is a “game-changer for Russia”, said one former Ukrainian official. With Kyiv also contending with slower deliveries of air defence interceptors from the US, the missile campaign has destroyed key military facilities and critical infrastructure ahead of winter. Ukraine’s ballistic missile interception rate improved over the summer, reaching 37 per cent in August, but it plummeted to 6 per cent in September, despite fewer launches, according to public Ukrainian air force data compiled by the London-based Centre for Information Resilience and analysed by the Financial Times.

    Yeah, I highly doubt the rate was ever 37% this year. “according to public Ukrainian air force data” sure dude, the famously reliable and truthful official Ukrainian government information!

    Ukraine’s air force on Wednesday reported all four Iskander-M missiles fired overnight had eluded the country’s defences and hit their targets. At least four drone-making plants in and around Kyiv were badly damaged by missiles this summer, said current and former Ukrainian officials. This included a strike on August 28 on a facility producing Turkish Bayraktar drones, according to public posts by local officials. Two missiles launched in that attack appeared to have targeted the offices of a company designing and producing components for drone systems, said two officials briefed on the incident. The Russian projectiles eluded Ukrainian air defences and also damaged the offices of the EU delegation and British Council, which were located nearby.

    The Patriot interceptors are the only ones in Kyiv’s arsenal capable of shooting down Russian ballistic missiles. Moscow’s cruise missiles can be taken down with less sophisticated air defences, but the updates have made it harder to do so, according to the officials. A western official briefed on Patriot performance data said the first indication of an upgrade to the Russian missiles was a marked drop in interception rates. They said a “pattern” had emerged in which incoming missiles behaved differently in their “terminal phase”, veering from their previously established engagement settings. The official’s assessment is supported by a report compiled by the US Defense Intelligence Agency’s special inspector general that covers the period of April 1 to June 30. The report said Ukraine’s armed forces had “struggled to consistently use Patriot air defence systems to protect against Moscow’s ballistic missiles because of recent Russian tactical improvements, including enhancements that enable their missiles to change trajectory and perform manoeuvres rather than flying in a traditional ballistic trajectory”. It cited a Russian attack on June 28 that included seven ballistic missiles, of which Ukraine shot down only one, and a barrage on July 9 — at the time the largest air assault since the start of the war — that included 13 missiles, of which the Kyiv downed or suppressed 7.

    Ukraine shared Patriot engagement data with the Pentagon and the air defence system’s US manufacturers, said the western and Ukrainian officials. Virginia-based Raytheon makes the Patriot system, while Maryland-based Lockheed Martin produces the system’s interceptor missiles. The data is used to make updates needed to keep pace with Russia’s adjustments, but one official said those improvements often lagged behind Moscow’s evolving tactics. Sergiy Kyslytsya, Ukraine’s first deputy foreign minister, told the FT “the Russians continue to significantly upgrade their Iskander and other missiles’ technology”. He stressed the need for Kyiv’s partners to choke off flows of western-made components to Russia, including via China. Ukraine’s defence ministry and air force did not respond to requests for comment. Analysts said software adjustments were likely to be the reason behind the Russian missiles’ increased effectiveness. Fabian Hoffmann, a missile researcher at the University of Oslo, said manufacturers routinely mined interception data to improve performance. Russia, he said, appeared to be doing this. The Iskander-M “can manoeuvre quite aggressively in the terminal stage”, he noted. Rather than costly hardware changes, tweaks to guidance systems could instruct a missile to execute a quick manoeuvre just before hitting the target and then dive steeply, complicating the Patriot’s tracking and engagement ability. “A steeper terminal trajectory, that’s something you can programme in the missile,” Hoffman said.

    Ukraine and Russia were “playing an adaptability game” when it came to their weapons technology, he said. But there was also a cat-and-mouse game being played in trying to destroy each other’s weapons systems. Kinzhal missiles are launched from Moscow’s strategic bombers or fighter jets out of reach of Ukraine’s air defences. Russia’s mobile Iskander missile launchers were also difficult for Kyiv to take out, Hoffmann said. Ukraine’s Patriot air defence systems, which consist of a radar, control station and launchers that are transported on trucks or trailers, are also mobile. Some of them have been targeted and damaged after months of sustained Russian attacks, meaning the country’s layered air-defence architecture has thinned. Specialist personnel trained on the Patriot systems are also a target, among them Lieutenant Colonel Denys Sakun, chief engineer of an anti-aircraft missile unit in Kyiv’s 96th Brigade. He had helped set up systems credited with what Kyiv said was the world’s first downing of a Russian Kh-47M Kinzhal missile. Sakun was killed in December while attempting to save Patriot equipment during a fire after a Russian strike in the Kyiv region, according to public accounts. Patriots were previously protected by other systems such as Europe’s Iris-T and medium-range batteries. Now, with some of those assets damaged or redeployed, “the Patriots have to cover themselves” while engaging incoming Russian missile threats in some cases, said one person familiar with the matter.

    Ukraine does not disclose information about the number of Patriot batteries it has and where they are deployed, but at least six are known to have been delivered, with components of at least an additional three delivered in recent weeks by Germany and Norway. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has pleaded with Ukraine’s western partners to provide his country with more, offering to purchase up to 10 complete systems. With winter approaching, Zelenskyy has warned Moscow is reverting to its familiar strategy of striking Ukraine’s power grid to plunge the country into darkness and sap morale. But Russia’s evolving missile technology makes this year’s threat more acute. “Unfortunately, this has already become a traditional Russian tactic,” he said. “Russia is once again trying to hit Ukraine with a blackout this year.”

    • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I read this article on lemmygrad the other day and it’s quite bad. The journalists confuse subsonic cruise missile strikes for ballistic missiles. They also treat the idea of terminally maneuvering ballistic missiles as if it’s some brand new esoteric technology which has never been tested against before; In reality it’s something that has existed for over four decades and gets actively tested against. They also confuse the concept of interception rate with a successful engagement rate, and don’t seem to understand that the defended area of a single Patriot battery against a ballistic projectile is quite small, even in a best case scenario (60km radius), so it’s obviously impossible to protect the entire frontline, yet alone the country.

      Longer breakdown on lemmygrad

      • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Thanks for the breakdown, I’m not as familiar with missile tech.

        It’s the supposed 37% interception rate which ticked me off, the whole article seems based on the premise that this is some new downward trend in the war stonks-down, when the Russians have been successfully hitting the Ukrainians for quite a while now. I guess maybe Ukrainians claims of how much they intercepted are starting to strain credulity even for Western audiences by now, and outlets like this are starting to have to come up with excuses like “well, earlier the claims were true but now the Russians have magically figured out how to trick the air-defense systems!” (and so we must send them even more Patriots and missiles!)

        • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The thing is any claimed “interception rate” for ballistic missiles is very much a function of where and what Russia is shooting at and what Ukrainians include in the stats, that aside from when they shoot at areas we know have defences against ballistic missiles like Kyiv/Kiev, it’s impossible to draw any useful conclusions (I’ve tried). Ukraine has what, between 6-10 Patriot batteries (not all of which will be equipped with PAC 3 and PAC 3 MSE interceptors, systems equipped with only PAC 2 GEM T like the Israeli Patriot batteries have a significantly smaller defended area against ballistic projectiles), and whatever’s left of their Soviet era S-300V (a completely different system from the regular S-300P) stocks to defend against ballistic missiles. That’s it. These are the only systems that can successfully engage ballistic projectiles. Vast areas of Ukraine within Iskander M/KN-23/Kinzhal range have no defences against ballistic missiles. The “interception rate” will probably go up again in a few months, clueless journalists will say it’s because Ukraine got more air defence systems, then it will go down again and the journalists will say Russia has discovered “new maneuvering technology” and the USA and NATO must send Ukraine more Patriots like you said.